Please Huck - you can not be serious!

This guy shows in all detail that the Nuclear Hexagram is a purely THEORETICAL CONSTRUCT that is derived from 2 OVERLAPPING core-TRIgrams (2 x 3).

This I-Ching System ONLY works with TRIgrams.



Adrian

Please see my edition above!

Here is how to construct a Nuclear Hexagram.

http://www.thetolteciching.com/blog/con ... hexagrams/

Adrian

... anybody with some logical understanding recognizes, that with the Kern-Trigramme-System the 64 symbols of the full I-Ching are reduced to 16. Sorry - I cannot go on with this style pf "discussion" - you use the wrong terms in different situations with changing connotations and do not ...

Sorry - while I did compose this reply with additional remarks I was not aware that you went further on your own special path. Please do not take this as an interruption of your contemplation - but since I think it maybe useful to other readers I'll post it and won't intrude further. Your last sente...

Sorry, this form of explanation says not much to me, I prefer mine ... I can see why that is and i also assume that you did not try very hard to understand the JPGs I made (I added one missed link though). Going through your link to your idea ( http://forum.tarothistory.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t...

If you read the Geomancy system as "12 houses + 7 planets + Draco" the Geomancy system is near to it. ... :-) but this doesn't change, that 22 is not 16. NO! Unfortunately you can not do that. The 16 are from a totally different school of thought. Much OLDER. Astrology - like in Sumer may...

OK. I will try do that. But it can take some days.
If I'm not able to that - in my opinion - I'll be back to and give a report on that too.

Adrian

Hi Huck! I'm very surprised - but also very glad - that you finally found your way to the 16 Geomantic Characters as the source for Tarot. Now you may not understand right away what i mean when I say this because you were always opposed to "C"s model - but this is a reply especially to the...

You are totally correct Huck ... ... IF we were talking in this topic about the thickness (and so: "playability" :) ) of the Visconti(-Sforza) Tarot sets in between several disputants - but surely we (you & me) were alone for quite a bit of pages and many posts. So "controlling&qu...

To mikeh: Otherwise it's not genuine reasoning, but an article of faith, like the virgin birth (for which counterexamples are irrelevant). Science and reasoning depend on general principles (e.g. the CY is based on alchemy, and Filippo Filippo engaged in alchemy--defensible in other cards and cases)...