test ... ALDINI4.txt ...

21
I translated the exchanged ALDINI4.txt with Google Translator and got this ...
I think, that there are no undesired ^P and and it is Fliesstext. I added no changes to the translation result.

Later I added the Italian documentary parts of Franco in double quotation style

Later I removed the double quotation to normal quote and changed the color of the Italian text to red. I hope, that this helps to develop some overview in the representation.

.................


Florence 1766 - Domenico Aldini under investigation

Franco Pratesi

1. Introduction
An introduction for this study requires few words. The documents examined are preserved in the State Archives of Florence, and in exactly the same fund and in the same archival unit already used for a previous study (Footnote 1): in the Inventory N/83 of the Miscellanea di Finanze fund A in the State Archives of Florence reads: 284 Playing Cards. Various papers concerning stamp duty - 1766-86. (Footnote 2)
On the other hand, the character in question has been encountered in several previous studies on playing cards in Tuscany (Footnote 3) because he was for decades the contractor and then the main minister for stamp duty on playing cards. His signature on a pre-established card in the deck was a fundamental requirement for those cards to be legally sold and used.
At the origin of the investigation was an anonymous letter, preserved among the documents that contain what was written about it by Aldini himself and his hierarchical superior, councilor Giuseppe Gavard. Given the absolute importance of the character for the history of playing cards in Tuscany in the second half of the eighteenth century, I consider it useful to transcribe a large part of these documents, also because they provide us with detailed information on the entire administration.

2. The anonymous letter
The letter that gives rise to the practice is written front and back on a white sheet in a handwriting and with a vocabulary that is not of a professional level, but not of an illiterate one either.
Accioché l’Altezza Vostra Reale, venga in cognizione, di più, e diversi disordini seguiti nell’Amministrazione G.ale; Bisognerebbe, che si degniasse Fare Rendere conto al Aldini Ministro delle Carte da Gioco,
e Carta Bollata, Primieramente è interessato con li Cartaj, di due per cento, sopra le Carte, che prende per
l’Amministraz.e G.ale Al pregiudizio di V: A: R:; Secondo si mette a Entrata ogni quartale delle partite
grosse al Fine perché paghino meno del loro Bollato, e anche anticipatamente, prima, che sieno Bollate, e
consegniate al Respettivo magazzino; Terzo tiene i Registri sopra de quali, e Fondato la Zienda delle Carte
é Carta Bollata, che senza contare gli Errori, che ci possono essere, sono anche pieni d’Errori, e Sgorbi, e
Grattature, per far dire alla Scrittura quel che vuole; Quarto fà anche un Commercio Continuovo, e illecito
di Carte, come di Vendere, far vendere, e barattare delle Carte difettose con delle buone, che si faceva dare
dal Magazzino, che non si puol fare senza pregiudizio di V:A: R:, si perché in quella maniera, e Giudice, e
parte; Quinto à ancora la Carta Bollata pare male Amministrata, v’è Certi interessi, che il medesimo riceve
per Regali, che Fanno, che la Carta non viene mai Simili a Campioni, che non serve, che il magazziniere
Francesco Fond strepiti, si va innanzi così, e questo Fà che V: A: R: mal servito, e il Pubblico mal Contento. V: A: R: saprà ancora, che aveva 282 Lire di sopra più provvisione per tenere un ajuto, che né à avuti
diversi, e non pagava nessuno, e frà questi un tal Cammillo Targioni essendo stato per lo spazio d’Anni tre
con lusingarlo d’un impiego al Servizio di V: A: R:, che poi si trovo senza paga, e senza Impiego. Che se
l’A: V: R: si farà bene informare dai Computisti, e Ministri della d.a Amministrazione dai Cartai, e a sindaci
fare rivedere i suoi Libri, che si trovera anche qualche cosa di più.
In order for Your Royal Highness to become aware of the various disorders that followed in the General Administration; It would be necessary to deign to make the Minister of Playing Cards and Stamped Paper accountable to Aldini, who is primarily concerned with the Cards, of two percent, above the Cards, which he takes for the General Administration to the detriment of V: A: R:; Secondly, every quintal of large consignments is entered at the end so that they pay less than their stamped amount, and also in advance, before they are stamped and delivered to the respective warehouse; Terzo keeps the registers above which, and founded the company of stamped paper, which, without counting the errors that may exist, are also full of errors, and gouges, and scratches, to make the Scripture say what it wants. ; Fourth, there is also a Continuous and illicit Trade in Cards, such as selling, having sold, and exchanging defective Cards for good ones, which was supplied by the Warehouse, which cannot be done without prejudice to V:A:R: , yes, because in that way, both Judge and party; Fifth, the stamped paper also appears to be badly administered, v�� Certain interests, which the same receives for gifts, which cause, that the paper is never Similar to Samples, which is of no use, that the warehouseman Francesco Fond makes an outcry, we move forward so, and this is why V: A: R: is poorly served, and the public is poorly satisfied. V: A: R: you will also know that he had 282 Lire above plus provision to keep an assistant, which he had no other, and he did not pay anyone, and among these a certain Cammillo Targioni had been for the space of Three years of flattering him with a job in the V: A: R: Service, which then found him without pay, and without employment. That if the A: V: R: it will be good to inform the Accountants, and Administration Ministers from the Papermakers, and to have the mayors review his books, that something more will also be found.

3. The "viglietto" in Gavard
The anonymous letter reaches the Grand Duke who starts the checks with the following "viglietto" sent by the councilor Angelo Tavanti to Giuseppe Gavard, the hierarchical superior of Aldini.
Ill.mo Sig.re Pr.re Col.mo
Per ordine di S.A.R. rimetto a VS.Ill.ma la qui annessa informazione anonima a fine che si compiaccia
di fare quei passi, che crederà opportuni per venire in chiaro se sussista quello che viene rappresentato, e di
poi riferisca con dire il suo sentimento.
E con perfetto ossequio mi confermo. Di VS.Ill.ma Dev.mo ed obbl.mo serv.re Angelo Tavanti
Firenze 12 Giugno 1776
Dear Mr. Pr.King Col.mo
By order of HRH I am sending the attached anonymous information to Your Excellency so that you may be pleased to take the steps you deem appropriate to clarify whether what is represented exists, and then report and express your feelings. .
And with perfect respect I confirm myself. Yours sincerely and obligatory servant, King Angelo Tavanti
Florence 12 June 1776

The tone of the request is rather abrupt, beyond the usual expressions of respect. The date of the anonymous complaint is not known, but the investigation begins here, mid-June. The continuation is simple: Gavard asks for a defense from the accusations directly from Aldini, who writes several pages with passion; then we have the "sentiment" of Gavard who exposes what has come to light, and finally the matter will be closed with another "Viglietto" from the Grand Duke.

4. Aldini's defense
Aldini's defense is written on about ten foolscap pages, usually using only the right half. Only on the first page are both columns used, on the left to list the two questions in full (in a different spelling) and on the right for the answers. Aldini's writing is read with some difficulty and the content of his answers does not appear well structured. Despite this, I decided to also transcribe these Answers in full because they include useful information for the detailed reconstruction of the control over playing cards in Tuscany in that period. It should be noted that the two questions posed concern only some of the negative aspects highlighted by the anonymous letter; there were six and therefore it can be assumed that the other four had already been clarified by the investigation started by Gavard.
Quesiti
P.mo: Si domanda Sotto qual titolo, et in virtù di chè il Sig.re Dom.co Aldini ha esatto dai Cartai un
tanto per cento sopra il valore, ò il quantitativo delle Carte da Essi vendute all’App.to, e successivamente
all’Amminist.e generale.
2.do: Con qual Facoltà il med:o Sig:re Aldini hà fatto in proprio, Negozio, ò Smercio di Carte da giuoco
Separatamente, et indipendentemente dalla vendita a cui Egli Soprintende per Servizio, et Interesse prima
dell’App.to et successivamente della Regia Amminist:e generale.
Risposte
Perche Dom.co Aldini possa ingenuam.e rispondere sopra i due Quesiti, che gli vengono fatti in carta
dall’Ill.mo Sig.re Cons.re Gavard, conviene premettere alcune notizie, e sono le appresso.
Dopo che l’Aldini fù fissato App.re del Bollo delle Carte da Gioco, che poi all’insinuazioni di Chi
rappresentava allora nel 1751 l’App.re Gen.le; cedé ad’esso App.re Gen.le; pensò frattanto al miglior regolamento di e.o App.to delle Carte; e fù determinato, che conveniva far vendere le Carte in tutti i luoghi dello
Stato per conto dell’App.to.
Questo regolamento non poteva eseguirsi senza che l’Aldini comprasse le Carte dai Cartai, onde furono
fissati i prezzi, che si convennero con i med.i Cartai con avere l’Aldini procurato la maggiore possibile
facilità in d.i prezzi.
E qui l’Aldini sfida i Cartai, e chiunque a dire, se fù ne anche sognata, ò ideata una mezza sillaba di
Manupolio, gratificazione, interesse Personale, ò altro.
Fosse il d.o Regolamento, ò fosse altra la causa, lo Smercio crebbe talm.e delle carte, che i Cartai non
potevano quasi supplire, a Segno tale che convenne far venire una quantità di Carte di Bologna.
Pensava intanto l’Aldini di erigere una Fabbrica di Carte in proprio per interesse dell’App.Gen.le; giacche non repugna, e si può essere Appaltatore, e Cartaio, come per lunghis.mo tratto di tempo è stato il
Molinelli; e furono prese diverse notizie per eseguire l’Idea.
Ciò saputosi dai Cartai, che prevedevano poter’essere la loro rovina, fecero molte, e molte pratiche con
l’Aldini per distorlo dal mettere in piede la d.a Fabbrica. Si raccomandorno, fecero promesse; ed’anco qui
l’Aldini sfida chiunque, se potrà dirsi, che si lasciasse indurre a cosa alcuna, ò se fù fatta mezza parola di
proprio interesse.
Intanto la Fabbrica dell’Aldini non andò più avanti per varie ragioni, fra le quali la principale fù quella,
che mancando Lavoranti capaci, e non giovando farli venire di fuori, conveniva Sedurre quelli dei nostri
Cartai, ciocche l’Aldini non volle fare per essere contrario a tutte le regole di Religione, e di onoratezza,
giacche in questo Caso sarebbe Egli stato la causa di d.a rovina de’ Cartai.
3
Allora fù che l’Aldini stette sempre addosso per così dire ai Cartai per farli lavorare, e gli obbligò a
crescere Lavoranti con infinito loro Guadagno, e vantaggio, che ridondava ancora per conseguenza in vantaggio dell’App.to.
Troppo ci vorrebbe, se l’Aldini dovesse ripetere tutte le proteste di gratitudine, che allora, e sempre gli
fecero, e gli hanno fatto i Cartai per questo Benefizio ed’infatti, come poteva impedirsi l’Aldini a non
erigere una Fabbrica di Carte, anche in proprio, quando questa non solo non avrebbe pregiudicato, ma anzi
avrebbe molti.mo giovato all’Interesse dell’App.to; e avrebbe, se poteva, e voleva eseguirsi portato sicuri,
e considerabili profitti all’Aldini, (l’erigesse in Proprio, ò per il Negozio,) che avrebbe Smerciate tutte le
Carte di questa Fabbrica, e poche, ò punte di quelle de Cartai.
Fin quì torna l’Aldini ripeterlo con Coraggio, e pro veritate, nulla, e poi nulla con Veduta del minimo
interesse dell’Aldini.
Dopo un lasso lungo di tempo, e certam.te di più d’un’anno, ò due, e forse più, perche l’Aldini non ne
ha memoria, trattandosi di cose di Venticinque anni sono, Egli che non solo consumava in proprio, e in
proprio regalava a Parenti, Amici molte Carte, perche tutti lo riguardavano allora, e sempre come App.re,
disse alla fine ai Cartai, che avrebbe gradito qualche recognizione di Carte per suo Consumo.
Il Rossi dunque diede, ed’accordò di Sua propria, mera, e libera volontà questa recognizione, che ora è
stata più, ora è stata meno, che non hà avuto alcun Patto fissato, che ragguagliavasi all’incirca non al due
per cento sopra le Carte vendute in genere, ma a una dozzina in circa di Carte, che l’Aldini avesse comprato
sulla sola valuta per altro delle Carte Senza bollo, e questa recognizione l’Aldini l’hà sempre avuta in Carte.
Il Molinelli poi non credè di dovere accordare quanto il Rossi, e tanto è vero, che l’Aldini non hà mai
preteso ciò per Patto, che Si contentava, e Si è contentato di ciò che di buon animo gli dava, e che sarà
consistito all’incirca a una Dozzina, ò poco più di Carte l’anno; e ciò non ostante il Molinelli hà venduto
Sempre più Carte del Rossi all’App.to, e all’Aldini in proprio.
Qual delitto, qual Mancanza, qual male dunque hà fatto l’Aldini? Egli certam.e non crede di avere di
che rimproverarsi. I Prezzi erano fissati da molto tempo, erano fissati più strettam.e; che fosse stato possibile, e per condurre i Cartai ad’accordare le Carte ai prezzi convenuti ci volle della fatica non poca, e un
lungo lunghiss.mo Trattato, e Sforzo.
Se poi i Cartai in vista dei Vantaggi come sopra, riportati dall’Aldini hanno voluto liberam.te; e di loro
propria volontà, e Soddisfazione, come lo dimostra la quiescenza di circa Venticinque anni, dare del proprio
questa tenue riconoscenza all’Aldini, che non l’ha mai pretesa per Patto, che non hà mai avuto in Vista,
prima, ne dopo il Trattato della Compra delle Carte, ò dei prezzi, che furon convenuti, Egli certamente non
hà creduto di avere mancato al proprio dovere.
E che ciò sia vero appena da amico stragiudiziale la sera del dì 14 Agosto Stante e a ore 6¼ seppe
l’Aldini, che l’Ill.mo Sig.re Cons.re Gavard faceva delle ricerche in questa materia, che Egli subito con
franchezza, e tranquillità sali da Sua Sig.ia Ill.ma; e di proprio moto con tutta l’ingenuità confessò il Fatto,
e dichiarò quanto Sopra e che Egli non hà mai creduto di fare cosa indebita.
Infatti se l’Aldini avesse preteso questa recognizione de jure, l’avrebbe pretesa anche dal Tognacci, dal
quale ciò non ostante hà comprato le Carte a proporzione, ed’a prezzo inferiore degli altri Cartai in Benefizio ora dell’Amm.ne Gen.le; senza che neppure per ombra sia caduto in mente questa cosa.
In oltre vi è da aggiungere, che sono almeno due anni, che l’Aldini non hà avuto cosa alcuna, perche
avendo potuto accorgersi, che i Cartai dopo la legge dei Giochi, per la quale è assai minorato il loro Profitto,
mostravano poca Soddisfazione di ciò, pagò, ed’hà pagato tutte le Carte prese in proprio, ed’al Tanini m.o
del Rossi, che disse di darli alcune Carte secondo il Solito, rispose nò, non le voglio, e in caso vi sarà sempre
tempo.
Il Rossi poi si dole, che l’Aldini hà preso meno Carte da Lui, che dal Molinelli. Se l’Aldini avesse avuto
in mira il proprio tenui.mo interesse, avrebbe preferito il Rossi; Ma la vera causa di ciò è stata sempre la
mancanza delle Carte, che hà avute il Rossi nella sua Fabbrica, perche l’Aldini non hà mai preferito alcuno,
quando hanno avuto Carte, in vista di Cosa alcuna.
Ecco, Ill.mo Sig.re, risposto ingenuamente al Primo Articolo delle Sue Domande; E venendo al Secondo.
Convien premettere, che la Vendita delle Carte non è una Privativa, ne un’annesso dell’App.to, che si
può eseguire da Chiunque, che quanti più sono i Venditori, più è il Vantaggio dell’App.to, che l’App.re
Gen.le in prima, e poi l’Amm.ne Gen.le non hà mai tenuto questa Vendita nella Città di Firenze, perche si
era certi, che i Cartai, e molti altri Venditori a tutte l’ore vendevano Carte, e che in tanto si volle dal d.o
App.re Gen.le; e poi si è seguitato dall’Amm.ne Gen.le questa vendita nei Posti Foranei, benche con scapito,
perche parve e pare, che possa contribuire allo smercio delle Carte.
L’Aldini dunque, che non hà mai fatto il pubblico Venditore di Carte; ma che hà servito Amici, Ministri,
Soggetti di distinzione, inclusive a tutti gli a.ri g.li; consegnando le Carte al prezzo di Crazie tredici le basse,
e di Crazie Venti le Minchiate; E queste Carte lee hà sempre comprate dai Fabbricatori e pagate al prezzo
legale, come costa dai Conti, e ricevute.
Molti hanno comprato le Carte dall’Aldini, perche le pagavano meno, e perche essere qui riposate credevano trovarle migliori: Cosa in sostanza forse non vera.
4
Questa vendita di Carte non solo non è pregiudiciale, ma giova infinitam.ee; perche ogni volta, che si
vende un mazzo di Carte entra in Cassa un Paolo; E questo deve essere l’oggetto principale di chi amministra questo Appalto, e in conseguenza ad esso dell’Amministra.e G.le.
Questa vendita quieta l’Aldini l’hà fatta fino dal Momento, che Egli prese l’Appalto; E tanto è vero, che
non avrebbe potuto pensare, giammai, che in ciò vi sia ombra di male, che Egli hà servito amici, Ministri,
App.ri Geen.li, senza riguardo, ò cautela, perche nulla repugnava, ò repugnar poteva al minimo disinteresse
della Casa, ò alla più esatta delicatezza del ministero, che anzi influiva, ed’influisce al Vantaggio della
Casa, non pregiudica, e non hà mai potuto pregiudicare ad’alcuno, e nemmeno ai Cartai, i quali in Sostanza
hanno sempre venduto le loro Carte.
Anzi pare all’Aldini, se non lo tradisse la Memoria, che in qualche luogo per stabilirvi la Vendita hà
mandato per un dato tempo le Carte, che hà fatto pagarsi a Contanti.
La Vendita delle Carte non è un’annesso della Conduzione dell’Appalto, ma è un Traffico particolare,
che si fa con discapito di spesa e col solo oggetto di vendere molte Carte, e che si può tralasciare forse
anche con profitto nelle presenti circostanze.
Che ciò sia vero a Livorno fù tralasciata la Vendita per conto dell’App.to perche si era certi, che vi
erano molti Venditori. Fù poi riaperta la d.a Vendita al tempo dell’Amm.ne Ge.e per essere più certi, che a
tutte l’ore vi si vendano le Carte; ma in sostanza per la parte della Vendita vi è detto Scapito sicuro.
Ecco con tutta ingenuità la dovuta risposta ai due quesiti fatti in Carta dall’Ill.mo Sig.r Cons.re Gavard
a Dom.co Aldini e che in Sostanza è l’istesso datoli in voce spontaneam.e prima di avere ricevuti d.i Quesiti
in Carta; col maggior ossequio hò l’onore di dirmi
Di VS.Ill.ma Dev.mo Obb.mo Ser. Dom.co Aldini
Firenze 17 Agosto 1776
Questions
P.mo: You wonder under what title, and by virtue of the fact that Mr. Dom.co Aldini has exacted from the Cardmakers such a percent above the value, is the quantity of the Cards sold by them to the App.to , and subsequently to the General Administration.
2.do: With what faculty did the doctor Mr. Aldini run his own business, sale of playing cards separately, and independently of the sale which he supervises for service, and interest before the application. to and subsequently of the General Regia Administ:e.

Answers
In order for Dom.co Aldini to be able to naively respond to the two questions posed to him on paper by the Most Respected Mr. Counselor Gavard, it is best to introduce some information, and they are the following.
After Aldini was appointed App.Re of the Playing Card Stamp, who then at Chi's insinuations represented the App.re Gen.le in 1751; handed over to the App. King General; in the meantime he thought about the best regulation of the Charter Department; It was determined that it was convenient to have the papers sold in all places of the State on behalf of the App.to.
This regulation could not be carried out without Aldini purchasing the Cards from the Cardmakers, whereby the prices were fixed, which were agreed with the average Cardmakers after Aldini had procured the greatest possible ease in prices.
And here Aldini challenges the Cartai, and anyone who says, if he even dreamed of it, a half syllable of Manupolio, gratification, Personal interest, is something else.
Whether it was the Regulation or the cause, the sale of papers increased so much that the cardmakers could hardly replace it, so much so that it was necessary to send in a quantity of papers from Bologna.
In the meantime, Aldini was thinking of building his own Card Factory in the interest of the General App. jackets are not repugnant, and one can be a Contractor and Papermaker, as Molinelli was for a very long stretch of time; and several ideas were taken to execute the Idea.
Having learned this from the Papermakers, who foreseen it could be their ruin, they made many, many negotiations with Aldini to divert him from setting up the Fabbrica. They recommended each other, made promises; and even here Aldini challenges anyone, if it can be said that he would allow himself to be induced into anything, if half a word of his own interest was said.
Meanwhile, Aldini's factory no longer progressed for various reasons, among which the main one is that, since there were no capable workers, and it was not useful to have them come from outside, it was better to seduce those of our paper makers, since Aldini did not he wanted to do so as to be contrary to all the rules of religion and honour, since in this case he would have been the cause of the ruin of the paper makers.
So it was that Aldini was always on top, so to speak, of the Papermakers to make them work, and forced them to grow Workers with their infinite profit and advantage, which consequently still redounded to the advantage of the App.to.
It would take too much if Aldini were to repeat all the protests of gratitude that the paper makers then and always made to him for this benefit and in fact, how could Aldini stop himself from building a paper factory? , even on its own, when this would not only not have jeopardized, but rather would have greatly benefited the interests of the App. and if he could and wanted to carry it out he would have brought certain and considerable profits to Aldini, (if he built it himself, for the Shop,) who would have sold all the Papers of this Factory, and a few of those of Paper makers.
Up to this point Aldini repeats it with Courage, and pro veritate, nothing, and then nothing with Aldini's View of the least interest.
After a long period of time, and certainly more than a year, or two, and perhaps more, because Aldini has no memory of it, since these were things of twenty-five years ago, he who not only consumed on his own, and on his own he gave many Papers to Relatives, Friends, because everyone was concerned about him then, and always as App.king, he finally told the Cardmakers, that he would have appreciated some recognition of Papers for his own consumption.
Rossi therefore gave and agreed with his own, mere and free will, this recognition, which now was more, now was less, which had no fixed agreement, which was approximately equal to the two percent above the cards sold in general, but for about a dozen cards, that Aldini had bought on the sole currency of other cards without stamp, and Aldini has always had this recognition in cards.
Molinelli then did not believe he had to grant as much as Rossi, and this is so true that Aldini never demanded this for Pact, who was satisfied, and was satisfied with what he willingly gave him, and which will have consisted of approximately a dozen, or a little more than papers a year; and despite this, Molinelli sold more and more of Rossi's papers to App.to, and to Aldini on his own.
What crime, what Lack, what evil did Aldini do? He certainly doesn't think he has anything to blame himself for. Prices had been fixed for a long time, they were fixed more strictly; that it had been possible, and to get the Cardmakers to agree the Cards at the agreed prices required quite a bit of effort, and a very long Treaty and Effort.
If then the cardmakers, in view of the advantages as above, reported by Aldini, wanted freely; and of their own will, and satisfaction, as demonstrated by the quiescence of about twenty-five years, to give this tenuous recognition of their own to Aldini, who has never claimed it as a Pact, which he has never had in sight, before , nor after the Treaty of the Purchase of Papers, and of the prices, which were agreed upon, He certainly did not believe that he had failed in his duty.
And that this is true, as soon as as an extrajudicial friend on the evening of August 14th, at 6 o'clock, Aldini learned that the Most Respected Mr. Counselor Gavard was carrying out some research in this matter, which he immediately with frankness and tranquility go up to His Ill. Ma; and on his own motion with all his naivety he confessed the Fact, and declared the above and that he never believed he was doing anything improper.
In fact, if Aldini had demanded this recognition de jure, he would have also demanded it from Tognacci, from whom he nevertheless bought the Papers in proportion, and at a lower price than the other Papermakers in benefit now of the Administration General; without even a shadow of this thing having occurred to me.
Furthermore, it must be added that Aldini has not had anything for at least two years, because having been able to realize that the card dealers after the law of the Games, due to which their profit was greatly reduced, showed little Satisfied with this, he paid, and paid for all the papers taken on his own, and to Rossi's Tanini, who said to give him some papers as usual, he replied no, I don't want them, and in case it will always be time.
Rossi then complains that Aldini took fewer cards from him than from Molinelli. If Aldini had had his own tenuous interest in mind, he would have preferred Rossi; But the real cause of this has always been the lack of the Papers that Rossi had in his factory, because Aldini never preferred anyone, when they had Papers, in view of anything.
Here, Most Honorable Sir, naively answered the First Article of your Questions; And coming to the Second.
It is important to point out that the Sale of Cards is not a Private Law, nor an annex to the Contract, which can be carried out by Anyone, and that the more Sellers there are, the greater the Advantage of the Contract, that the App.King General first, and then the Admin. Gen.le never held this Sale in the City of Florence, because it was certain that the Papermakers, and many other Sellers at all the hours they sold Cards, and that in the meantime it was wanted by the App.re Gen.le; and then this sale in the Posti Foranei was followed up by the General Administration, albeit with a disadvantage, because it seemed and appears that it could contribute to the sale of the Papers.
Aldini therefore, who has never been a public card seller; but who has served Friends, Ministers, Subjects of distinction, including all the leaders; delivering the Cards at the price of Thirteen Crazies for the low ones, and Twenty Crazies for the Minchiate ones; And these Cards have always been bought from the Fabricators and paid for at the legal price, as it costs by the Counts, and received.
Many bought the cards from Aldini, because they paid less for them, and because they believed they would find them better being rested here: Which in essence perhaps is not true.
This sale of cards is not only non-judicial, but it is infinitely beneficial; because every time a deck of cards is sold, a Paolo enters the cash register; And this must be the main object of whoever administers this Contract, and consequently of the General Administration.
Aldini made this quiet sale from the moment he took the contract; And so much so, that he could never have thought that there was a shadow of evil in this, that he served friends, ministers, generals, without consideration, or caution, because nothing was repugnant, could be opposed to the slightest disinterest of the House, to the most exact delicacy of the ministry, which indeed influenced, and influences, the Advantage of the House, does not prejudice, and has never been able to prejudice anyone, not even the Papermakers, who Basically they have always sold their cards.
Indeed, it seems to Aldini, if his memory did not betray him, that in some place to establish the Sale he sent the Papers for a given time, which he had paid in Cash.
The Sale of Cards is not an annex to the Conduct of the Contract, but is a particular Traffic, which is carried out at the expense of expense and with the sole object of selling many Cards, and which can perhaps even be ignored with profit in the present circumstances .
That this is true in Livorno the Sale on behalf of the App.to was left out because it was certain that there were many Sellers. The sales office was then reopened at the time of the General Administration to be more certain that the cards are sold there at all hours; but essentially for the Sale part it is called Safe Expense.
Here, with all ingenuity, is the due answer to the two questions asked in the paper by the Honorable Mr. Councilor Gavard to Dom.co Aldini and which in substance is the same one given to him spontaneously and before having received Paper Questions; with the greatest respect you have the honor to tell me
By Yours Most Honorable Ser. Dom.co Aldini
Florence 17 August 1776
.
5. Response and Memory of Giuseppe Gavard
A few days after the Answers to the Questions written by Domenico Aldini, councilor Gavard is able to forward his response letter to the Grand Duke, with a memorandum on the investigation he carried out.
2. Dipartimento. Carta bollata. Carte da Giuoco
V. Protocollo de 23 Settembre 1776 Del Segr.rio Di Schmidveiller N. 14
Altezza Reale
In esecuzione dell’Ordine in un Viglietto del Consigliere Angelo Tavanti segnato nel dì 12. Giugno
p.mo p.to, mi do l’onore con la qui ingiunta Memoria di render conto a Vostra Altezza Reale delle diligenze
da me praticate per venire in chiaro se sussistano diverse accuse date in una Rappresentanza anonima a
Dom.co Aldini Ministro Principale della respettiva Zienda delle Carte da giuoco, e della Carta Bollata.
Non ho saputo trovare nel contegno di D.o Aldini quella grave reità, che indicano le azzardate espressioni dell’Accusatore, parendomi soltanto che Egli abbia piuttosto in qualche parte mancato di zelo, ed a
quella scrupolosa delicatezza, che è propria di un Ministro, il quale non abbia eccezioni, che peccato contro
la fedeltà.
Qualora dunque non si voglia considerare come una pena sufficiente per l’Aldini la vera mortificazione,
che il medesimo hà provata dalle Accuse portate al Real Trono contro di Lui, credo che vi si potesse aggiungere un serio avvertimento ad esser Egli più cauto e meno interessato per l’avvenire, tanto più che dopo
la scoperta di ciò che passava tra esso, ed i Fabbricatori delle Carte, hò preso misure tali, che non vi è da
temere ulteriore inconveniente per la Zienda.
Non devo però in questa occasione tralasciare di esporre a V.A.R., che l’Aldini, a motivo della sua
sconcertata salute, e per la sua infelice attuale complessione, non è certamente più in grado di prestare
un’esatto ed assiduo servizio, come sarebbe necessario, nuocendoli notabilmente l’applicazione al segno
che esso neppure puole contrassegnare le Carte con la propria firma, prevalendosi della mano dell’Aiuto.
E prostrato appiè del regio Trono mi rassegno
Di Vostra Altezza Reale Umilissimo Serv.e e suddito Giuseppe Gavard
Firenze 26. Agosto 1776
2. Department. Stamped paper. Playing Cards
See Protocol of 23 September 1776 of the Secretary of Schmidveiller No. 14
Royal Highness
In execution of the Order in a note from the Councilor Angelo Tavanti marked on the 12th of June, I give myself the honor with the hereby enjoined Memory to give an account to Your Royal Highness of the diligence I have taken to come it is clear whether there are various accusations given in an anonymous representation to Dom.co Aldini, Principal Minister of the respective Playing Card and Stamped Card Company.
I have not been able to find in Do Aldini's behavior that grave crime indicated by the Accuser's risky expressions, it only seems to me that he has in some part lacked zeal and that scrupulous delicacy which is typical of a Minister, the which has no exceptions, what a sin against fidelity.
Therefore, if we do not want to consider the true mortification that he felt from the accusations brought against him to the Royal Throne as a sufficient punishment for Aldini, I believe that a serious warning could be added to him to be more cautious and less interested in the future, especially since after the discovery of what passed between him and the Card Makers, he took such measures that there is no need to fear further inconvenience for the Company.
However, on this occasion I must not fail to explain to VAR that Aldini, due to his disconcerted health, and his current unhappy complexion, is certainly no longer capable of providing exact and assiduous service, as it would be necessary, causing considerable harm to the application to the sign that it cannot even mark the Papers with its own signature, taking advantage of the hand of the Helper.
And prostrate beside the royal throne I resign myself
Of Your Royal Highness Most Humble Servant and subject Giuseppe Gavard
Florence 26. August 1776

Attached to the letter we find the following long Memoir, in which Gavard replies point by point to all the anonymous accusations.
MEMORIA. Per venire in chiaro, se sussistano sei Capi d’accuse date a Domenico Aldini, Ministro
principale delle Ziende delle Carte da Giuoco, e della Carta bollata, in una Rappresentanza anonima avanzata a S.A.R., e rimessami con l’ingiunto Viglietto di S.E. il Sig.re Cons.re Angelo Tavanti in data del dì
12. Giugno 1776., e segnato di N° 1, con ordine di dirne il mio sentimento, hò praticate le diligenze che
accennerò in appresso a misura che riporterò ciascun capo di d.e accuse.
5
P.mo Si dice, che il prenominato Ministro sia interessato con i Cartai di due per cento sopra le Carte,
che prende per l’Amministrazione Generale.
Tre sono in Firenze i Fabbricatori delle Carte da giuoco, cioè Zanobi Rossi, Pietro Molinelli, e l’Ebreo
Emanuelle Sacerdote sotto nome di Salvadore Tognacci.
I due primi facendo le Carte di miglior qualità, ne vendono all’Amm.ne Gen.le una maggior quantità,
che l’Ebreo, il quale ne stabilì poco tempo fà la fabbrica con il Tognacci, che fallì; Da quest’ultimo l’Aldini
non hà ricevuta alcuna recognizione, che meriti di essere rilevata.
Interrogato il Rossi, se l’istesso Aldini abbia avuto seco qualche interesse, rispose subito, che fino dal
primo tempo, in cui esso Aldini succedé al Molinelli nell’Appalto delle Carte aveva percetto un due per
cento sopra le Carte senza bollo, che li venivano conseegnatee, ò vendute, vale a dire, che sopra ogni Cento
Dozzine di Mazzi di Carte non bollate, ne riceveva due Dozzine: la quale Partecipazione puole avere importato circa scudi cinque l’anno, soggiungendo però, che dall’anno 1774. in poi l’Aldini medesimo hà
rinunziato a tale Emolumento.
Interrogato similmente il Molinelli sopra l’istesso oggetto, rispose, che aveva sempre accordato all’Aldini uno per Cento sopra le sole Carte basse venduteli, vale a dire, che per ogni Cento Dozzine di Mazzi di
dette Carte, gliene passava una Dozzina senza bollo, la quale vale L. 4.16.-, e ciò durò fino all’anno 1774.,
in cui esso Aldini desisté dal percipere d.a Partecipazione, che era molto inferiore a quella accordata dal
Rossi, poiché per il Molinelli si estendeva alle sole Carte basse, e a uno per Cento.
Domandai successivamente all’Aldini se fosse vero, che Egli ricevesse dai Cartai Rossi, e Molinelli un
tanto per cento sopra le Carte che aveva da essi comprate tanto a tempo dell’Appalto Generale, che durante
la vegliante Amministrazione; ed il medesimo non solo confessò subito in voce come la cosa era andata;
ma me ne diede ancora il discarico, che trovasi negli annessi fogli di N° 2. sotto la data del dì 17. Agosto
1776., ove Egli narra, che sul principio che esso ottenne per se l’Appalto del Bollo delle Carte, il quale
dovette poi cedere all’Appalto Generale Masson, i Cartai Molinelli e Rossi li accordarono il sopradivisato
Emolumento respettivo, in vista specialmente, che Egli non erigesse una nuova Fabbrica di Carte, la quale
avrebbe pregiudicato a loro medesimi, come avrebbe potuto fare.
Continuò dunque l’Aldini a ricevere l’accennata partecipazione nel corso dei respettivi Appalti Generali, non solo perché credette sempre di essere stato pregiudicato nella surriferita cessione, reputandosi
come Conduttore principale di tal’Impresa, ma ancora perché avendo fissati più strettamente che fosse possibile i prezzi delle Carte, che i Cartai vendevano alla Zienda, non ne risultava pregiudizio alcuno agl’Interessati; Onde con l’istessa massima hà seguitato a percipere anche nei primi anni della vegliante Amm.ne
Gen.le la sopradivisata piccola partecipazione fino all’anno 1774., che spontaneamente vi renunziò.
L’oggetto non è stato per se stesso di grande importanza; ma tolta di mezzo la sud.a partecipazione, si
poteva ottenere dai Cartai qualche piccola riduzione di alcuni dei prezzi delle Carte già fissati, conforme
mi è riuscito con indurre a forza di persuasive il Rossi a diminuire di quattro denari il prezzo del Mazzo
delle Carte basse, e di denari sei quello delle Minchiate, e con indurre similmente il Molinelli a diminuire
di denari quattro il prezzo respettivo delle une, e delle altre; e se apparisce che sulla Minchiate Io abbia
scemato al Rossi due denari più che al Molinelli, ciò deriva dall’essere sempre stato più alto di denari due
il prezzo fissato da principio col Rossi medesimo, atteso che si pretende, che le sue Carte sieno migliori di
quelle degli altri Fabbricatori. Se si considera la quantità delle Carte provviste nell’anno 1775., la sopradivisata diminuzione respettiva del prezzo delle medesime importa in vantaggio della Zienda L. 122., somma
molto superiore alla partecipazione ò Emolumento, che i Cartai accordavano all’Aldini.
Avendo dunque l’Aldini non solo desistito spontaneamente dall’anno 1774. di ricevere come prima la
sud.a partecipazione, ma confessato ancora ingenuamente tutto il seguito, non mi pare, che Egli possa essere
incolpato di dolo, ma bensì di aver mancato a quella scrupolosa delicatezza, che è propria di ogni onorato,
zelante, e disinteressato Ministro, che deve studiare, e procurare tutti i vantaggi di Chi lo tiene provvisionato
al suo Servizio.
Non sarebbe poi stato possibile di venire in cognizione del preaccennato piccolo Interesse che passava
frà l’Aldini, ed i Cartai, se i Cartai medesimi non lo avessero palesato a qualcheduno, lagnandosi in certo
modo di tale aggravio, specialmente dopo il Rincaro dei Materiali che servono alla fabbricazione delle
Carte. Per maggior sicurezza, e contro il metodo tenuto costantemente dal di p.mo Gennaio 1750. fino al
presente, hò stabilito di non lasciare più al solo Aldini l’incumbenza di provvedere le Carte, ma che Egli
concerti meco ogni volta la Compra con L’intervento del Computista, e del Magazziniere, secondo il bisogno dell’Amministrazione.
2.o Dicesi che l’Aldini in fine di ogni Quartale metta grosse Partite a Entrata, perché i Cartai paghino
meno del Loro bollato, ed anco anticipatamente prima che le Carte siano bollate, e consegnate al respettivo
Magazzino.
Quest’accusa è senza fondamento; Quando i Cartai vogliono far bollare le Carte, il Ministro fà una
Polizza della quantità, e qualità delle medesime: la registra al suo libro d’Entrata e Uscita: Addebita i Cartai
dell’importare del Bollo, secondo il numero, e la qualità delle Carte da bollarsi: Consegna d.a Polizza al
Magazziniere destinato ad assistere al Bollo nelle Stanze del Fisco: Si contano le Carte: L’istessa Polizza
rimane presso i Ministri del Fisco, i quali in fine d’anno ne fanno lo spoglio, e ne prendono pure Registro.
6
Hò stabilito che la medesima Polizza passi in mano al Computista avanti che sia portata al Fisco dal Magazziniere. In fine d’ogni trimestre fatto il conto di quanto i Cartai devono per la tassa del Bollo, e dell’importare delle Carte da essi vendute all’Amm.ne, se ne distendono dal Computista gli opportuni Mandati per
il pagamento alla Cassa, che non è amministrata dall’Aldini.
3.zo Si dice che tenga malissimo la Scrittura della Carta bollata, e delle Carte da giuoco: Che la medesima sia piena di errori, di sgorbi, e di grattature per farli dire ciò che esso vuole.
In quanto alle Carte, l’insussistenza di quest’accusa si rileva bastantemente dal tenore del precedente
articolo, e perché seguisse il supposto inconveniente, bisognerebbe che il Ministro, ed il Magazziniere fossero perfettamente d’accordo, il che non è verosimile.
Maggiore poi diventa la Calunnia rispetto alla Scrittura della Carta bollata, come si osserverà in appresso all’Articolo 6.o.
4.o Si dice che faccia un continuo, ed illecito Commercio di Carte, con vendere, far vendere, e barattare
delle Carte difettose con delle buone, che si fa dare dal Magazzino dell’Amministrazione.
In quanto al baratto delle Carte difettose, il Magazziniere Fond mi hà positivamente dichiarato, che mai
di ciò lo hà ricercato l’Aldini, onde in questa parte l’accusa è falsa.
In quanto poi alla vendita particolare delle Carte, che il pred.o Aldini fà per suo Conto, avendolo Io su
di ciò interrogato, ne hò avuta la di lui ingenua confessione nei precitati fogli segnati di N. 2., ove adduce,
che non è in privativa la vendita delle Carte; bollate che siano: Che quanto maggiore è lo Smercio delle
medesime, maggiore diventa il Prodotto del Bollo, sù cui cade appunto la Privativa: Che da ciò risulta alla
Zienda un vantaggio e non un pregiudizio, poiché la medesima scapita sulla vendita, e guadagna unicamente
a misura del maggior prodotto del Bollo, al quale contribuiscono molti Smerciatori delle Carte.
Tutte queste ragioni sono ammissibili per quello che riguarda sostanzialmente l’interesse della Zienda;
ma trovo solamente, che un tale Traffico particolare sia contrario alla delicatezza e non convenga ad un
Ministro provvisionato dalla Zienda medesima, il quale dà sempre da sospettare di se a chi non è bene
informato dell’interno sistema di questa piccola Amministraz.e; Perciò hò significato all’Aldini essere di
suo decoro il renunziare al sud.o Smercio particolare, il quale riducesi poi ad un tenue oggetto, il suo unico
guadagno consistendo nell’ottenere dai Cartai qualche piccola agevolezza sul prezzo delle Carte, che compra da loro in poca quantità, rimanendo però sempre intatta la tassa del Bollo pagata dai Cartai medesimi.
5.o Rilevasi, che l’Aldini riceveva da S.A.R. L 282. l’anno di più della sua solita Provvis.e, acciò pagasse un’Aiuto, e che hà tenuto per tre anni un tale Cammillo Targioni senza pagarla ma con lusingarlo
solamente di procurarli un’Impiego, che esso Targioni non hà peranche ottenuto.
Con benigno Rescritto del dì 11. Giugno 1770. fù accordato all’Aldini un’aumento di Provvisione di
L.282. l’anno, acciò tenesse un’Aiuto di sua scelta, ed a sue spese. Egli si prevalse veramente del prenominato Targioni, né premeva all’Amministrazione gen.le di sapere quali condizioni erano state pattuite frà di
loro. Il Targioni però ricorse a S.A.R. lagnandosi dell’Aldini, ed in una mia lunga Informazione del dì 16.
Febb. 1773. delucidai tutte le circostanze dell’affare. L’Aldini si servì successivamente di un altro aiuto,
contro la scelta del quale reclamai, trattandosi di un Ragazzetto, della cui esattezza non vi era da compromettersi; Ma S.A.R. avendo per Rescritto del dì 28 Xbre 1775. fatto cessare all’Aldini il buonificamento
delle sopraccennate L 282; con averli assegnato un’altro Aiuto stipendiato dall’Amministrazione; L’accusa
che si dà all’Aldini sù quest’Articolo non mi sembra meritare ulteriore attenzione, ò discussione.
6.o Dicesi finalmente, che l’Aldini amministri male la Carta bollata, ricevendo certi Regali, per i quali
Egli ammette la Carta inferiore ai Campioni, non servendo che il Magazziniere Fond strepiti, e se ne lamenti.
Il Ministro non può assolutamente far male sù questa Partita, se non in quanto Egli fosse capace d’intendersela con il Magazziniere, e con gli Sceglitori per ricevere Carta scadente, ed inferiore ai Campioni: I
prezzi della Carta furono fissati previa una specie d’Incanto con le più rigorose diligenze: Quando la Carta
arriva da Colle a Firenze, passa immediatamente alla consegna del Magazziniere; la Scrittura ne è respettivamente ben tenuta dal Ministro principale, dal Magazziniere, e dal Computista; Una sol volta parve al
Magazziniere Fond, che una Partita di Carta non fosse di tutta perfezione; ma essendosene fatta la Perizia
da più, e diversi Cartai esperti alla mia presenza, si riconobbe veramente, che la medesima non era da
rigettarsi. La maggiore giustificazione poi da darsi sù questa materia è, che a tempo dell’attuale Impresario
della Carta da bollo non si sono più sentiti i Ricorsi, che per l’avanti erano frequenti sopra la qualità di d.a
Carta, e che l’eccezioni date poche volte da taluni erano riferibili alla cattiva qualità dell’Inchiostro, ed al
modo dello scrivere, piuttosto che ad un’imperfezione essenziale che ci fosse nella Carta bollata.
26. Ag.o 1776 Giuseppe Gavard
MEMORY. To clarify, whether there are six counts of accusation given to Domenico Aldini, main Minister of the Playing Card and Stamped Paper Companies, in an anonymous representation made to HRH, and sent to me with the injunction Viglietto of HE Mr. King Cons.re Angelo Tavanti dated 12th June 1776, and marked with No. 1, with the order to express my opinion, I have carried out the diligence that I will mention below to the extent that each item will report of accusations.

P.mo It is said that the aforementioned Minister is interested in the Cardmakers of two percent above the Cards, which he takes for the General Administration.
There are three Playing Card Makers in Florence, namely Zanobi Rossi, Pietro Molinelli, and the Jew Emanuelle Sacerdote under the name of Salvadore Tognacci.
The first two, making papers of better quality, sell a greater quantity of them to the General Administration than the Jew, who established the factory a short time ago with Tognacci, who went bankrupt; Aldini did not receive any recognition from the latter that deserves to be noted.
When Rossi was questioned whether Aldini himself had any interest in him, he immediately replied that from the first time, in which Aldini succeeded Molinelli in the Contract for the Papers, he had received two percent on the Papers without stamp duty, which they were delivered and sold, that is to say, that out of every One Hundred Dozens of Unstamped Decks of Cards, he received two Dozens: which Participation may have imported about five scudi a year, adding however, that from the year 1774 Onwards Aldini himself renounced this emolument.
When Molinelli was similarly questioned on the same subject, he replied that he had always granted Aldini one per cent on the sole low cards sold to him, that is to say, that for every hundred dozen decks of said cards, he gave him a dozen without stamp duty. , which is worth L. 4.16.-, and this lasted until the year 1774, in which Aldini desisted from receiving the Partecipazione, which was much lower than that granted by Rossi, since it extended through the Molinelli to low cards only, and to one percent.
I subsequently asked Aldini if ​​it was true that he received from the Papermakers Rossi and Molinelli a certain percentage of the Papers he had purchased from them both at the time of the General Contract and during the Supervising Administration; and the same man not only immediately confessed in his voice how the matter had happened; but he still gave me the discharge, which is found in the annexed sheets of No. 2 under the date of August 17, 1776, where he narrates that on the principle that he obtained for himself the Contract for the Stamp Papers, which he then had to surrender to the General Contractor Masson, the Papermakers Molinelli and Rossi granted him the above-mentioned respective Emolument, especially in view that he would not build a new Paper Factory, which would have prejudiced themselves, as he could have done.
Aldini therefore continued to receive the aforementioned participation during the respective General Contracts, not only because it always believed it had been prejudiced in the aforementioned transfer, considering itself as the main Tenant of that Company, but also because it had established more strictly that it was possible the prices of the Papers, which the Papermakers sold to the Company, there was no prejudice whatsoever to the Interested parties; Therefore, with the same maxim, he continued to receive the above-divided small participation even in the early years of the vigilant General Administrative Officer until the year 1774, who spontaneously renounced it.
The object was not in itself of great importance; but once the aforementioned participation was out of the way, it was possible to obtain from the Cardmakers some small reductions in some of the prices of the Cards already fixed, as I was able to persuade Rossi to reduce the price of the Deck of Cards by four denarii. Low cards, and of six denarii that of the Minchiate, and similarly inducing Molinelli to reduce the respective price of one and the other by four denarii; and if it appears that on the Minchiate I have reduced Rossi by two denarii more than by Molinelli, this derives from the price initially set by Rossi himself having always been two denarii higher, given that it is claimed that his Cards are better than those of other Fabricators. If we consider the quantity of cards supplied in the year 1775, the aforementioned respective decrease in the price of the same amounts to the advantage of the Company L. 122., a sum much higher than the participation - Emolument, which the card makers granted to Aldini.
Having therefore not only spontaneously desisted from the year 1774 from receiving the aforementioned participation as before, but still naively confessed all the rest, it does not seem to me that he can be blamed for fraud, but rather for having failed to that scrupulous delicacy, which is typical of every honoured, zealous and disinterested Minister, who must study and procure all the advantages of Whoever keeps him provided for his Service.
It would not have been possible to become aware of the aforementioned small interest that passed between Aldini and the paper makers, if the paper makers themselves had not revealed it to someone, complaining in a certain way about this burden, especially after the increase in the price of materials. which are used for the manufacture of cards. For greater security, and against the method consistently followed from the first of January 1750 until the present, I have decided to no longer leave the task of providing the Papers to Aldini alone, but that He agrees with me every time the Purchase with the intervention of the accountant and the warehouse worker, according to the needs of the administration.
2.o It is said that Aldini places large Entry Lots at the end of each Quartale, so that the Cardmakers pay less than their stamped amount, and also in advance before the Cards are stamped and delivered to the respective Warehouse.
This accusation is without foundation; When the Cardmakers want to have the Cards stamped, the Minister draws up a Policy of the quantity and quality of the same: he records it in his Entry and Exit book: He charges the Cardmakers for importing the Stamp, according to the number, and the quality of the Papers to be stamped: Delivery from the Policy to the Warehouse Manager assigned to attend the Stamp in the Tax Rooms: The Papers are counted: The same Policy remains with the Tax Ministers, who at the end of the year carry it out , and they also take Register of it. I have established that the same Policy passes into the hands of the Accountant before it is brought to the Tax Office by the Warehouse Keeper. At the end of each quarter, once an account has been taken of how much the Cardmakers owe for the stamp duty, and of the import of the Cards sold by them to the Administration, the appropriate Mandates for payment to the Cashier are drawn up by the Accountant, which It is not administered by Aldini.
3.zo It is said that he has a very poor record of the writing of the stamped paper and of the playing cards: that it is full of errors, scribbles and scratchings to make it say what he wants.
As for the Papers, the non-existence of this accusation is sufficiently evident from the tenor of the previous article, and for the supposed inconvenience to occur, the Minister and the Storekeeper would have to be in perfect agreement, which is not likely.
The calumny then becomes greater with respect to the writing of the Carta stampa, as will be observed below in Article 6.o.
4.o It is said that he carries out a continuous and illicit trade in cards, selling, having sold, and exchanging defective cards for good ones, which he gets from the Administration Warehouse.
As regards the exchange of the defective papers, the Warehouse Manager Fond positively declared to me that Aldini never sought this, therefore the accusation in this part is false.
As regards the particular sale of the Papers, which the former Aldini carried out on his behalf, having questioned him about it, I received his naive confession in the aforementioned sheets marked No. 2, where he adduces , that the sale of the Cards is not private; stamps that are: That the greater the sale of the same, the greater the Product of the Stamp becomes, so that the Privative Decree falls: That this results in an advantage for the Company and not a detriment, since the same is deducted from the sale, and earns only in proportion to the increased revenue from the Stamp Duty, to which many Card Dealers contribute.
All these reasons are admissible as far as the interests of the Company are concerned; but I only find that such a particular Traffic is contrary to delicacy and is not suitable for a Minister supported by the Company itself, who always gives rise to suspicion to those who are not well informed of the internal system of this small Administration; Therefore it was felt to Aldini that it was in his dignity to renounce the South or particular sale, which was then reduced to a small object, his only gain consisting in obtaining from the Cardmakers some small relief on the price of the Cards, which he buys by them in small quantities, while the stamp duty paid by the cardmakers themselves always remains intact.
5.o It should be noted that Aldini received from HRH L 282. per year more than his usual provision, so that he could pay an aid, and that he kept a certain Cammillo Targioni for three years without paying it but with only flattering him to get him a job, which Targioni did not even obtain.
With a benign Rescript dated 11 June 1770, an increase in Provision of L.282 was granted to Aldini. per year, so that he could hold an assistant of his choice, and at his own expense. He really took advantage of the aforementioned Targioni, nor did the General Administration care to know what conditions had been agreed between them. Targioni, however, resorted to HRH complaining about Aldini, and in a long information of mine dated 16 February. 1773. I explained all the circumstances of the affair. Aldini subsequently made use of another assistant, against whose choice I complained, since it was a little boy, whose accuracy there was no need to compromise; But HRH having, by Rescript dated 28 October 1775, made Aldini cease the improvement of the aforementioned L 282; with having assigned them another assistant paid by the Administration; The accusation that is leveled against Aldini in this Article does not seem to me to deserve further attention, it is a discussion.
6.o Finally, it is said that Aldini mismanages the stamped paper, receiving certain gifts, for which he admits the paper is inferior to the samples, with no need for the warehouseman Fond to make a fuss and complain about it.
The Minister absolutely cannot do harm to this Match, except in so far as He was capable of reaching an agreement with the Warehouse Manager, and with the Selectors to receive poor quality Paper, and inferior to the Samples: The prices of the Paper were fixed after a kind d�Incanto with the most rigorous diligence: When the Card arrives from Colle to Florence, it is immediately handed over to the Warehouseman; the Scripture is respectively well kept by the Chief Minister, by the Storekeeper, and by the Accountant; Only once did it appear to Storekeeper Fond that a batch of paper was not entirely perfect; but since a further appraisal had been carried out, and several expert cardmakers were in my presence, it was truly recognized that the same was not to be rejected. The major justification to be given in this matter is that at the time of the current Stamp Paper Manager the Appeals were no longer heard, which previously were frequent regarding the quality of Stamp Paper, and that the The exceptions given a few times by some were attributable to the poor quality of the ink and the way of writing, rather than to an essential imperfection in the stamped paper.
26. Aug. 1776 Giuseppe Gavard

6. Resolution ticket
The latest document on the issue is a short "note" without a header, recipient or sender, written quickly without taking care of handwriting, but clearly of an official nature.
Vuole S.A.R. che resti ultimato l’affare delle accuse portate contro Domenico Aldini Ministro delle
Carte da giuoco e della Carta Bollata, con fargli una seria ammonizione.
V. Risoluzione di S.A.R. de12 Sett.e 1776 N° 26. - V. P. S. 23. Sett.e 1776 N° 14.
HRH wants the matter of the accusations brought against Domenico Aldini, Minister of Playing Cards and Stamped Paper, to be completed, with a serious warning to him.
See SAR Resolution of 12 September 1776 N� 26. - VPS 23. September 1776 N� 14.
And so "the deal remains completed". The serious accusations have been denied. The Grand Duke accepts Councilor Gavard's proposal, but accepts it in the heavier version. According to the councillor, Aldini's hierarchical superior, the mortification suffered by the minister due to the accusations and the subsequent investigation would also have been sufficient. The Grand Duke, or someone on his behalf, instead judges that a serious warning is necessary.
The fact is that the discovery, only following the anonymous accusations, of Aldini's anything but exemplary conduct ends up directly affecting Gavard himself, who only now realizes the situation and takes initiatives aimed at making it more The relationship between the minister and the paper makers must be regulated. If things had been functioning badly for a quarter of a century, a severe punishment for Aldini would logically have entailed a punishment, however reduced, for Gavard too. It is for this reason that in such cases it is customary to entrust the investigation to a third party judge.

7. Conclusions
From the investigation into Domenico Aldini we obtain quite precise indications, both explicit and implicit, on the control of the production of playing cards in Florence in the second half of the eighteenth century and in particular on the figure of Domenico Aldini, first contractor and then main minister of the sector .
The defense of the minister by his superior (which appears to be a defense rather than an objective investigation into the various accusations) suggests that between the lines Aldini's behavior went well beyond his official duties . Aldini received a salary far higher than that of all his employees. In the same 1776 the distribution of the annual provisions of the office were distributed as follows, in lire: Aldini 1700, Manetti's assistant 400, Fond warehouseman 200, Soldi forwarder 60, Brunelleschi stamper 53.6.8. (Footnote 4)
Evidently Aldini intended to earn even more. The situation was made embarrassing by the fact that while the "principal minister" was more or less illegally topping up his large salary, his employees, who were aware of it, forwarded requests to the Grand Duke to obtain small bonuses or salary increases, regularly pointing out the conditions of poverty in which their family found themselves.
One of his tasks, perhaps the main one, was to write his signature on a playing card of all the decks of cards put on the market. For this reason, he even had recourse to an assistant who signed "Domenico Aldini" in his place; the assistant was paid first indirectly (with an increase in Aldini's salary which in theory, but not in practice, had to be fully transferred to the assistant) and then directly by the administration. Furthermore, it turns out that Aldini had also found ways to increase his already abundant salary, thanks to under-the-table agreements with Florentine card makers whereby he could receive from them, and then sell, packs of cards for free or at a reduced price .
Perhaps the anonymous accusations were more striking than they should have been, but certainly almost all of Aldini and Gavard's justifications appear rather weak to us.

Florence, 21.11.2023

Footnotes
1 https://www.naibi.net/A/BOLLO1781.pdf
2 https://archiviodistatofirenze.cultura. ... -finanze-a
3 F. Pratesi Playing-Card Production in Florence. Tricase 2018; F. Pratesi, Card games in the Grand Duchy of Tuscany. Ariccia 2015
4 F. Pratesi Playing-Card Production in Florence. Tricase 2018, on p. 23; https://www.naibi.net/A/209-1775TUSC-Z.docx; http://trionfi.com/ev09
Last edited by Huck on 06 Jan 2024, 07:01, edited 4 times in total.
Huck
http://trionfi.com

The Casino of Holy Trinity

22
About Huck's post previously: be advised not to take the machine translation very seriously, especially for the parts in Italian. The machines are not yet as good as the people they mimic when it comes to older Italian, especially in correspondence by people of varying educational attainments and not intended for publication. I am working on a more accurate translation, with Franco's help. It should be ready soon.

However, Huck's tests have been of considerable benefit, for finding out how to easily remove the line-breaks in the translation (compare the two), thus improving Google Translate's accuracy (since otherwise it doesn't know that the two lines are part of the same sentence).

In the meantime, here is another of his essays, where I have corrected what Google Translate provides. Franco helped where I asked him for it, and more, but is not responsible for the result. The original, from Dec. 2, 2023, is at https://www.naibi.net/A/TRINITA.pdf. It is fairly entertaining, especially the squabble about the primiera, something like a poker hand. Perhaps here, in what were mainly academies, but also establishments exempting its members from the usual prohibitions against gambling, we see the beginnings of the casinos shown in James Bond movies, the ones requiring formal dress and barring undesirables - quite different from American casinos today, full of slot machines making electronic noises, or those of the western movies where disputes are settled by gunfights.

After that, there is some good data on minchiate and regular decks in Florence of that time.


Eighteenth century in Florence: Conversazione of the Casino of Santa Trinita

Franco Pratesi

1. Introduction

A few years ago I conducted research in the Istituto dei Nobili [Institute of Nobles] collection of the State Archives of Florence and obtained some information on card games in that environment. (note 1). On that occasion I also carried out some research in scattered documents preserved by three previous associations that then merged to form the new Institute of Nobles. For these three, I found various pieces of information on theatrical performances, academic discussions of pre-established topics, rented premises and related payments, quality and quantity of members, and so on. I didn't glimpse anything about games that could possibly be played there.

I recently resumed my research, starting with the “Conversazione” of the Casino of S. Trinita. [Note for non-Italians: A Conversazione was an organization for conversing and other interactions among members, a kind of salon. A casino was a house where such activities occur, typically a small villa or lodge. "S. Trinita = Holy Trinity.] While for the other two associations of the time in the Inventory of the Archive on the Institute of Nobles we read some news on their prevailing activities, for this Conversazione, the conclusion based on the documents preserved is the following: "The acts of the internal life of this Academy tell us little or nothing.” (note 2).

2. The documents studied
I examined the following documents, indicated as follows in the same Inventory:

No. 11 Input and output of the Institute of Nobles of the Casino of S. Trinita, 1752 to 1761 - P.
No. 12 Envelope containing receipts (bound and loose) of the Conversazione of the Casino of S. Trinita, 1684-1761.
No. 13 First Filza [group of documents in an archive typically held together by a string or long nail] of past justifications of the Academy of Nobles, from 15 May 1689 to 1 May 1698.
No. 14 Envelope containing: files relating to various transactions of the Academy of the Casino of Nobles, 1676-1761.

No. 11, marked P, is the latest in a long series of input and output books. There are only eleven written pages, mostly recording membership fees collected, and these records do not highlight any gaming activity in the Conversazione. Even in the three voluminous files of receipts and justifications, it is not easy to find traces of what was sought. Files No. 13 and No. 14 are similar in content, but not in structure: No. 13 contains a thick bundle of sheets tied together without being grouped by subject, while No. 14 contains about twenty files with headings of relatively homogeneous content, again composed of loose cards.

The main topics are association fees, with frequent lists of delinquent members or requests for suspension of payment due to prolonged absence; exchanges of correspondence on this matter are abundant. Almost equally abundant is the evidence of the nobility of foreign visitors, for whom there is a copy of the passport and letters of introduction (usually in Latin) from the sovereigns of their states of origin or from known nobles who testify to the validity of their noble titles.

The main activity appears to be the management of an academy in which young nobles follow courses and participate in plays and presentations, especially on the occasion of celebrations at the grand ducal court. Out of curiosity, the traditional subjects were in the morning: law, mathematics, French and Italian, drawing, Italian and French dancing, fencing, jumping on horseback, pike and flag, and in the afternoon: morality, geography and history, civil and military architecture, German and Italian languages, fencing, jumping on horseback, pike and flag, and French dancing.

Regarding game activities, in the No. 13 series I only saw a negative mention, in the sense that a draft of 1690 of a statute directs "that any sort of gaming [probably meaning what we would call gambling – trans.], even in jest, is prohibited in the House of the Academy." As for literary exercises in any language that one

______________
1. F. Pratesi, Giochi di carte nel Granducato di Toscana, Ariccia 2015.
2. https://archiviodistatofirenze.cultura. ... nobili.pdf


2
might imagine to have been in frequent use, there is only an invitation to participate every Wednesday evening at the Accademia degli Apatisti, [for which see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accademia_degli_Apatisti - trans.] in Via de' Pescioni.

However, in fascicle 13 of file No. 14 we read, "Orders on Card Games, and cases followed in this matter. 1743," just what I was looking for. Opening the file, unfortunately, we find only two sheets. One is a large printed sheet, folded, with the 1743 ban on gambling: all the licenses are revoked, and from now on only new licenses will be authorized, "signed by the Tax Accountant, with the tax ordained in said Rescript, the payment of which must appear at the foot of the license. With a declaration, however, that this general revocation of licenses does not include the Gentlemen's Casinos, which are found opened in various cities of the State with the approval of the Most Serene Grand Dukes." In short, the members keep a copy of the general prohibition, as it certifies that it does not apply to them!

More interesting, because it cannot be found elsewhere, is the other sheet, handwritten on both sides, with the only "case" present. I transcribe it below, inserting paragraphs and changing the punctuation.

The Bambara case
Playing Bambara, Tizius initiates the stake, Sempronius and Caius meet it, and the others throw theirs away [vanno a monte]. Caius makes primiera [a desirable combination], shows it to Sempronius and another who did not meet the stake, and then throws it away [getta a monte]. Sempronius pays. Tizius adds: if I have to pay the stake, I want to see the primiera, and since you, Caius, have thrown your cards away you cannot demand the stake, but rather you have to pay it to me who holds my cards in my hand; and my points, although small, are the ones that win because I hold them in my hand. A dispute arises. The Minister was called to have it judged.
The Minister [in this case with the sense of supervisor] asking how the case is, Caius replies together with Sempronius: You should ask [players and bystanders] whether by showing a primiera on the table, and then throwing it away, it should be respected. And Tizius does not contradict this representation, although other than the case.
The Minister inquires of it, and comes to judge, that when a primiera has been on the table it must be respected, even if it is thrown away, as there are no other primieras that can counteract it, however greater or lesser. However, since there is another primiera on the table unrevealed, the person who holds it on the table can also claim to make it count as greater by saying that his should be counted, and the other, thrown away, not. But since there are no other primieras, the one that is said to have already been on the table must be considered good, since everyone is free to look at the cards, yes or no.
Once the Minister answered what had been decided, Tizius paid the stake without objecting. Once the Tavolino game [round] is over, Tizius goes against the Minister saying that he didn't know how to do his job because the primiera hadn't been on the table [i.e. revealed to all], and if he didn't know how to do it, the minister should learn or do some other job, and that he [Tizius?] would leave it to himself [?] to do what he thought was right.
The Minister added to him that when Sempronius and Caius presented the case to him he should have objected and said that the case was not as presented. Tizius replied that he was not obliged to do so, but that the case should be described by those around him. And the Minister replied that Tizius's silence at the representation made by Caius and Sempronius was a sign that he approved, and that it was not necessary to hear the case from those around him unless the parties to the dispute were not in agreement about the facts.
It is appealed.

[Explanation: the point at issue is that the primiera was only shown to two players without being revealed to all, whereas the situation was later described, and judged, as if it had been revealed.]
It can be deduced that the "case" is so tangled that it requires the opinion of some higher authority. It is probably the Minister himself who forwards the request for review, so as to receive authoritative approval of his behavior as an impartial judge.

Even if the case encountered is unique, it provides us with information about the environment. The three nobles of the dispute mentioned are covered, at least one temperamental, at least one cunning, and the dispute itself; above all, the game of bambara, a variant of primiera, a very old game that could cost fortunes in the case, not unusual in those environments, of playing with high stakes.

3. Envelope No. 12 - The Receipt Notebook [Quaderno]

I considered this No. 12 as the most promising because interesting information could emerge from the receipts for small expenses, and I was not disappointed. This archival unit actually does not present itself today in the form of an envelope but of a large binder, with two very different objects inside, at least apparently: a book covered in parchment and a thick bundle of receipts in loose sheets, badly tied with string between two wooden slats whose lateral dimensions are considerably smaller than the sheets.

3
The book is also, in effect, a book of receipts. However, in this case we are not dealing with individual receipts subsequently bound in a book, but with a book or notebook [quaderno] - which is exactly what would be indicated on its cover: Quaderno di Riceute Della Conversaz.e de SS.ri Del Casino di S. Trinita. Del 1684 al 1761 - initially dedicated to recording the receipts written by those who collected money from the Conversation. On each page, two or three receipts can typically be read, signed by the person collecting the money or by someone on his behalf. Most of these receipts concern the six-monthly rentals of the premises, but there are also many receipts for maintenance work by craftsmen, especially bricklayers, painters, and carpenters.

But what exactly did these illustrious gentlemen do in the “Conversation”? Obviously, they were conversing, by definition, but were they just talking? Certainly, the nobles also drank good wine, because receipts for many flasks are found (of different quality for gentlemen and servants). Did they play games? In this entire book, I saw a suggestion of only one game, sbaraglino, which, among other things, is a typical game of the backgammon family between two players, and therefore would not seem sufficient for a very large "conversation."
On 17 December 1712
I, Paolo Marghieri, received twenty-six Lire in consideration of a Sbaraglino with its accompanying pieces and cups, and because he said he didn't know how to write, asked me Vincenzo Zurli in my own hand to make the present [statement] under his request and presence. 26 L[ire].
All that remains is to look for any playing cards among the loose sheets.


4. Envelope No. 12 - The loose sheets

On the sheet containing the receipts we read, “Various Receipts relating to the Accademia del Casino from 1731 to 1760.” These loose sheet receipts are also partly actual receipts from craftsmen which list the work done and the amount paid, separately on their own sheet. Receipts of this type are mostly added in bulk, separately, after the normal receipts. There are also some revenue receipts, for example, one in 1749 for Payment of Taxes current and Arrears, in which the following names of members can be read:
Ill:mo [Most illustrious] Sig:re [Lord] Alessandro Orazio Pucci
Ill:mo Sig:re March.e [Marquis] Andrea Bourbon Del Monte
Ill:mo Sig:re March.e Ferdinando Incontri
Ill:mo Sig:re Alfonso Marsili
Ill:mo Sig:re Count Guicciardini
Ill:mo Sig:re Prior Giulio Orlandini
Ill:mo Sig:re March.e [Marquis] Andrea Alamanni
Ill:mo Sig:re Caval.e [Knight] Bened.o Tempi
Ill:mo Sig:re. Ferdinando Nerli
Ill:mo Sig:re March.e Scipione Capponi
Ill:mo and Cla.mo Sig:re Sen.re [Senator] Anton Francesco Acciaiuoli
This is only a part of the company; in other documents are much longer lists; in any case, as expected, they are certainly not the names of popular Florentines!

However, the typical receipts are nothing more than a list of small expenses that the servant presents on the first of the month for what he had paid in the previous month on the most diverse occasions. In fact, here you can read about everything; fortunately for us, we also find those playing cards that we were looking for as an explanation of the activity of the “Conversation” of Santa Trinita.

There are also obviously recurring expenses, such as candles, lighting oil, brooms, canoes, stationery, and in winter firewood and charcoal; there are also occasional expenses for small jobs, repairs, and alms. Of the two types of expenses, playing cards appear among the recurring ones, in the sense that there are not many monthly receipts where playing cards do not appear at all. Unfortunately, there are many years when playing cards do not appear for the simple reason that monthly receipts were not kept. I have gathered together, in a single table below, all the occurrences that I found in this bundle of receipts.

[Below, “low cards” means cards of lower dimension, smaller or shorter than minchiate and “grandi” cards, and with 40 cards per deck.]

DATE – LOW CARDS – EXPENDITURE – MINCHIATE – EXPENDITURE – ROVESCINO - EXPENDITURE
Image
5
Image
Translation of the note at the bottom of the table: "* Purchased together: 180 gettoni [small round chips] and 3 dozen white fiscie [modern fisci = larger chips, often rectangular, with a value of an agreed number of gettoni]."

As can be seen, the series is fairly continuous over time, with the exception of a first scattered receipt from 1841, the range covered is smaller and more recent than we could have hoped for. The data for 1841, as a single value, does not allow us to extrapolate the absence of a minchiate deck or the rather high number of low cards to the entire year; however, it serves at least to confirm the long-term consistency of card prices.

As noted in previous research, the prices of the cards were expressed in a simple way by dozens of decks: thus, in this period of time, 14 lire per dozen for the low cards, 22 for minchiate, and 16 for rovescino. To go from this base to the prices of various numbers of decks has become quite difficult today, due to the subdivision of one lira into 20 soldi and one soldo into 12 denari (or into three quattrini, as was usual in practice).

The decrease in the decks of cards used each year is evident and can be verified at a glance in the following graph for low cards (1) and minchiate (2).

Decks per year
Image
We don't know exactly what the favorite game with low cards was, perhaps hombre or tressette, certainly suitable for a “conversation” of the time, but more probably the bambara already encountered in 1743 and better compatible with the subsequent appearance of rovescino. For minchiate and rovescino, the games are those linked to the deck. At first glance, one would conclude that minchiate disappeared after 1754, but in fact the ratio between ordinary and minchiate decks never differed too much from the 10 percent also found in other companies of players at the time.

As far as rovescino is concerned, the situation is different. The name of the game has been retained locally still today, in particular for variations of tressette, but in general the name was and still is sometimes used for non-trick-taking games of various types. However, in this environment


6
and era, rovescino was the Italian name corresponding to the French reversis, a game of chance whose rules can be found described in detail by one of the leading experts on the subject. (note 3)

Due to the nature of this game, in this case there are additional costs for the purchase of small and large chips, but if looked after with care it is only a one-time expense, because they are objects that do not wear out, unlike cards. It is therefore not surprising that in the few times in which we subsequently find the purchase of rovescino decks, we no longer find the costs for the associated tokens and chips.

5. Conclusion

It was reasonable to suspect that in the “Conversations” of the Lords of the Santa Trinita Casino, time was spent playing cards. However, no information on this activity appears in the minutes and accounts books that were kept. In a receipt book can be found only the purchase of a sbaraglino board. Only in the loose sheets with the lists of incidental expenses made during the month by the servants were the expenses for decks of playing cards identified, actually rather many. We thus obtain a complete list of their purchases for the period from 1752 to 1759. For the following years, we know that this “Conversation” converged into the new Casino dei Nobili, and therefore it is logical not to find other receipts here. Less obvious is the absence of previous receipts, with one exception, from 1741, but one can imagine that receipts of this kind, reserved only for small expenses, were easily dispersed.

Florence, 02.12.2023
______________
3. https://www.parlettgames.uk/histocs/reversis.html
Last edited by mikeh on 17 Jan 2024, 02:27, edited 2 times in total.

Re: test ... ALDINI4.txt ...21

23
... the test ...
viewtopic.php?p=26387#p26387

... was just an experiment to find a good way to translate the texts of Franco ... you can ignore it. Michael will make better translations.

I added ...
I translated the exchanged ALDINI4.txt with Google Translator and got this ...
I think, that there are no undesired ^P and and it is Fliesstext. I added no changes to the translation result.

Later I added the Italian documentary parts of Franco in double quotation style

Later I removed the double quotation to normal quote and changed the color of the Italian text to red. I hope, that this helps to develop some overview in the representation.
I think it worthful to modify the Italian text style against the other parts of the text. Perhaps there is a better way as just modifying the font color to red.
Huck
http://trionfi.com

Domenico Aldini under investigation: translation

24
Here finally is what I hope is an adequate translation of Franco's essay on the hapless Signore Domenico Aldini (https://www.naibi.net/A/ALDINI.pdf). Franco has been on his trail quite a while, first mentioning him in an essay written in 1990, at the end of an article in English published in The Playing Card, https://www.naibi.net/A/48-FLOMAK2-Z.pdf, "Florentine Cardmakers and Concession Holders (1477-1751)." In 2013 came a longer piece (https://www.naibi.net/A/209-1775TUSC-Z.docx), again in English, focusing on the second half of that century, but only peripherally on Aldini. In October 2023 he posted transcriptions of documents from 1778-81 (https://www.naibi.net/A/BOLLO1781.pdf) with commentary, a translation of which will appear in this thread soon. The two in English are well worth reading as background for the current piece, which concerns an investigation into precisely Aldini, the main collector of the duty on playing cards, on accusations of corruption.

One perhaps should be aware that the Grand Duke involved here was not a member of the Medici family that had ruled Tuscany for two centuries. The family had been unable to produce an heir, and the Duchy was transferred, without a shot fired, to Austria. The new hereditary Grand Duke was Peter Leopold (1747-1792), son of Empress Maria-Theresa (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leopold_I ... an_Emperor). A child also of the Enlightenment, when he became Grand Duke in 1765 (aged 18 - but for the next five years under the watchful eyes of counselors appointed by his mother), he was eager to bring Florence to new economic heights, breaking the aristocracy's stranglehold on modernization.

Without Franco's continual help, a readable but accurate translation of this essay would not have been possible. Remaining errors are up to me; do not hesitate to point them out.


1
Florence 1766 - Domenico Aldini under investigation


Franco Pratesi

1. Introduction


An introduction for this study requires few words. The documents examined are preserved in the State Archives of Florence, and in exactly the same section and in the same archival unit already used for a previous study (note 1): in Inventory N/83 of the Miscellany of Finances A section in the State Archives of Florence one reads: 284, Playing Cards. Various papers concerning stamp duty - 1766-86. (note 2)
However, the personage in question has been encountered in several previous studies on playing cards in Tuscany, (note 3), because he was for decades the contractor and then the main minister for the duty stamp on playing cards. His signature on a pre-established card in the deck was a fundamental requirement for those cards to be legally sold and used.

The origin of the investigation was an anonymous letter preserved among the documents that contain what was written about it by Aldini himself and his hierarchical superior, counselor Giuseppe Gavard. Given the absolute importance of Aldini for the history of playing cards in Tuscany in the second half of the eighteenth century, I consider it useful to transcribe a large part of these documents, also because they provide us with detailed information on the entire administration.

2. The anonymous letter

The letter that gives rise to the practice is written front and back on a white sheet in handwriting and with a vocabulary that is not at a professional level, but not an illiterate one either. [Divided into short sections for clarity - translator.]
In order that Your Royal Highness [V. A. R.– Vostra Altezza Reale] may become aware of more and various disorders that occurred in the General Administration, it would be necessary to deign to bring to account Aldini the Minister [here in the sense of official, in this case the head official] of Playing Cards and Stamped Paper.

First, he has the interest with the card makers, of two percent above the cards, which he takes for the General Administration to the prejudice of V. A. R.

Second, he puts some large batches in input toward the end of every quarter [of the year], so that less is paid of their stamped amount, and also in advance, before they are stamped and delivered to the respective warehouse.

Third, he keeps the registers on which the Enterprise of Cards and Stamped Paper is founded, which, without counting the errors that may exist [independently], are also full of errors, scribblings, and scratchings to make the writing say what he wants.

Fourth, he also engages in continual and illicit trading of cards, such as selling them, having them sold, and exchanging defective cards for good ones that he obtained from the warehouse, which cannot be done without prejudice to V.A.R., because in that way, he is judge, and party [to the suit].

Fifth, he also has seemingly badly administered the Stamped Paper: there are certain interests, which the same receives as gifts, which cause, that the paper is never similar to the samples. It is of no use, that the warehouse keeper Francesco Fond makes noise, so we go on, and this makes V.A.R. poorly served, and the public poorly satisfied.

V.A.R. will also know that he had 282 Lire more above his provision to keep an assistant, of whom he has had several before, and he didn't pay anyone, and among these a certain Cammillo Targioni, having been for the space of three years with flattering him with a job in the service of V.A.R., who then found himself without pay and without employment. If the A.V.R. will let yourself be well informed by the accountants and ministers of the said Administration of the card makers, and have the statutory auditor review his books, more will also be found.
3. The note to Gavard

The anonymous letter reaches the Grand Duke, who starts the checks with the following note sent by Counselor [to the Grand Duke] Angelo Tavanti to Giuseppe Gavard, Aldini's hierarchical superior.
________
1. https://www.naibi.net/A/BOLLO1781.pdf.
2. https://archiviodistatofirenze.cultura. ... -finanze-a.
3. F. Pratesi, Playing-Card Production in Florence, Tricase 2018; F. Pratesi, Giochi di carte nel Granducato di Toscana, Ariccia 2015.


2
Dear Most Illustrious Most Respected Pr.re [?] Signore
By order of His Royal Highness [S.A.R.] I am sending Your Most Illustrious Lordship the hereto attached anonymous information to the end, as it pleases you, of taking the steps you deem appropriate to clarify whether what is represented has substance, and then to report your feelings.

And with perfect respect I confirm myself.
Your most devoted and much-obliged servant Angelo Tavanti
Florence 12 June 1776
The tone of the request is rather abrupt, beyond the usual expressions of respect. The date of the anonymous complaint is not known, but the investigation begins here, mid-June. The continuation is simple: Gavard asks for a defense of the accusations directly from Aldini, who writes several pages with passion; then we have the "feelings" of Gavard, who explains what has come to light, and finally the matter will be closed with another note from the Grand Duke.

4. Aldini's defense


Aldini's defense is written on about ten legal-sized pages, usually using only the right half. Only on the first page are both columns used, on the left to list the two questions in full (in a different spelling) and on the right for the answers. Aldini's writing is read with some difficulty, and the content of his answers does not appear well structured. Despite this, I decided to also transcribe these Answers in full because they include useful information for the detailed reconstruction of the control over playing cards in Tuscany in that period. It should be noted that the two questions posed concern only some of the negative aspects highlighted by the anonymous letter; there were six, and therefore it can be assumed that the other four had already been clarified by the investigation started by Gavard.

Questions

First. You ask under what title, and in virtue of what, Signore Domenico Aldini has exacted from the card makers so much percent above the value or quantity of cards sold by them to the Concession [or Contract: Appalto], and subsequently to the General Administration.

2nd. With what authority has the same Signore Aldini made on his own, a business or sale of playing cards separately, independently of the sale which he supervises for Service and Interest first for the Contract and subsequently for the General Administration.

Answers
In order for Domenico Aldini to be able to candidly respond to the two questions that are put to him on paper by the Most Illustrious Signore Counselor Gavard, it is best to introduce some information, as follows.

After Aldini was appointed Contractor of the Stamp Duty on Playing Cards, then, due to insinuations made of him at this time in 1751 from the [office of the] General Contractor, he ceded [the concession] to this General Contractor. He thought in the meantime about the best regulation of this Cards Concession, and it was determined that it was profitable to have cards sold in all places of the State on behalf of the Concession.

This regulation could not be carried out without Aldini purchasing the cards from the card makers, whereby the prices were fixed, which were agreed with the card makers, with Aldini having procured the greatest possible facility in said prices.

And here Aldini challenges the card makers and anyone else to say, if half a syllable of manipulation, gratification, personal interest, or otherwise, was even dreamed of or conceived.

Whether it was the said regulation, or the cause was otherwise, the sale of such cards increased so much that the card makers could hardly satisfy the demand, to such an extent that it was necessary to import a quantity of cards from Bologna.

In the meantime, Aldini was thinking of building his own card factory in the interests of the General Concession, since it is not repugnant, and one can be [both] a contractor and card maker, as Molinelli was for a very long stretch of time; and several communications were taken to execute the idea.

The card makers having learned of this, foreseeing that it could be their ruin, made many, many negotiations with Aldini to dissuade him from setting up said factory. They pleaded, made promises; and here too Aldini challenges anyone, if it can be said that he allowed himself to be induced into anything, or if half a word was said in his own interest.

Meanwhile, Aldini's factory no longer went forward for various reasons, among which the main one was that, since there were no capable workers, and it was not beneficial to have them come from outside, it was better to seduce those of our card makers, which Aldini did not want to do, it being contrary to all the rules of religion and honor, since in this case he would have been the cause of said ruin of the card makers.

3
So it was that Aldini was always on top of the card makers, so to speak, to make them work, and obliged them to increase the workers, with infinite profit and advantage, which consequently still redounded to the advantage of the Concession.

It would be asking too much if Aldini were to repeat all the professions of gratitude that the card makers then and always made to him for this benefit, and in fact, how could Aldini be prevented from building a card factory, even on his own, when this would not only not have jeopardized, but rather would have greatly benefited the interests of the Concession, and if he could and wanted to carry it out, would have brought certain and considerable profits to Aldini (if he built it on his own, or for the business), who would have sold all the cards of this factory, and little or none of those of the card makers.

Up to this point Aldini repeats it with courage, and pro veritate [in truth], nothing, and nothing again, [done] with a view to Aldini’s slightest interest.

After a long period of time, certainly more than a year or two and perhaps more, because Aldini has no memory of it, since these were matters of twenty-five years ago, he who not only on his own consumed, and on his own gave many cards to relatives and friends, because everyone was concerned about him then, and always as Contractor, he finally told the card makers that he would have appreciated some recognition with cards for his consumption.

Rossi therefore gave and granted, simply of his own free will, this recognition, which was now more, now less, having no established agreement, which amounted to approximately no more than two percent of the cards sold in general, but at around a dozen [decks of] Cards, which Aldini had bought on the sole currency of other cards without stamps, and Aldini has always had this recognition in cards.

Molinelli then did not believe he had to grant as much as Rossi, and so much so, that Aldini never demanded this as a pact, that he was and is content with what he gave him willingly, which will have consisted of approximately a dozen, or a little more, [decks of] cards per year; and this notwithstanding that Molinelli always sold more cards than Rossi to the Concession, and to Aldini himself.

What crime, what fault, what evil did Aldini do? He certainly doesn't think he has anything to blame himself for. Prices had been fixed for a long time, were fixed more strictly than had been possible, and to get the card makers to accord the cards the agreed prices required quite a bit of exertion and very long negotiation and effort.

If then the card makers in view of the advantages as above, reported by Aldini, wanted freely, and of their own will and satisfaction, as demonstrated by the quiescence of about twenty-five years, to give this tenuous recognition of their own to Aldini, who has never claimed it as a pact, which he has never had in mind, before or after the negotiation on the purchase of cards or the prices that were agreed upon, he certainly did not believe that he had failed in his duty.

And that this is true as soon as from an extrajudicial [part-time judicial?] friend on the evening of August 14th at 6:15 o'clock Aldini learned that His Illustrious Signore Counselor Gavard was carrying out investigation in this matter, he immediately with frankness and tranquility came up to His Illustrious Lordship; and on his own motion in all candor confessed the fact, declared the above, and never believed he was doing anything improper.

In fact, if Aldini had demanded this recognition de jure [by right], he would have also demanded it from Tognacci, from whom he nevertheless bought cards at a proportional rate and at a lower price than from the other card makers, in benefit now of the General Administration, without even a shadow of this thing in mind.

Furthermore, it should be added that Aldini has not received anything for at least two years, because he realized that the card dealers showed little satisfaction after the gambling law, due to which their profit was significantly reduced. Because of this, he paid and has paid for all the cards taken for himself, and to Tanini, the same as to Rossi, who said to give him some cards as usual, he replied no, I don't want them, and in any case there will always be time.

Rossi then complains that Aldini took fewer cards from him than from Molinelli. If Aldini had had his own tenuous interest in mind, he would have preferred Rossi’s. But the real cause of this has always been the lack of cards that Rossi had in his factory, because Aldini never preferred anyone, when they had cards, with nothing else in view.

Here, Most Illustrious Signore, having candidly answered the first article of your questions, coming to the Second.

It is important to point out that the sale of cards is not a [state-authorized] monopoly, nor an annex to the Concession that can be carried out by anyone, and that the more sellers there are, the greater the advantage to the Concession. The General Contractor first, and then the General Administration never held this sale in the city of Florence, because it was certain that the card makers and many other sellers sold cards at all [legal] hours, which in the meantime was requested by the General Contractor; and then this sale was followed up by the General Administration in places outside of Florence, although with detriment, because it seemed and appears that it could contribute to the sale of cards.

Aldini therefore, who has never been a public card seller, but has served friends, ministers, subjects of distinction, including all the general administrators, delivering the cards at the price of thirteen crazie [denomination of money = 20 denari or 1/12th of a lire] for the low ones, and twenty crazie for the minchiates. And these cards have always been purchased from the manufacturers and paid at the legal price, as is seen from the accounts and receipts.

Many bought cards from Aldini because they paid less for them, and because reposing here they believed they would be found better: which in essence perhaps is not true.

4
This sale of cards is not only not prejudicial, but it is infinitely beneficial, because every time a deck of cards is sold, a Paolo enters the Intake [?: Cassa], and this must be the main object of whoever administers this Concession, and consequently of the General Administration.

Aldini did this quiet selling from the moment he took the Concession; and it is so true that he could never have thought that there was a shadow of evil in this, that he served friends, ministers, and general administrators without consideration or caution, because he did nothing repugnant, and could do nothing repugnant, in the slightest disinterest to the House, or to the most exact delicacy of the ministry, which indeed influenced, and continues to influence, the Advantage of the House, does not prejudice, and has never been able to prejudice anyone, also not the card makers, who in essence have always sold their cards.

Indeed, it seems to Aldini, if memory has not betrayed him, that in some place to establish the sale, he sent cards for which he paid cash, for a given amount of time.

The sale of cards is not an annex to the conduct of the Concession, but is a particular trade, which is carried out to the detriment of expenditure and with the sole object of selling many cards, and which could perhaps even ignore profit in the present circumstances.

That this is true [is confirmed by the fact that] in Livorno the sale on behalf of the Concession was omitted because it was certain that there were many sellers. The sales hall was then reopened at the time of the General Administration to be more certain that the cards were sold there at all hours; but essentially for the sale part it is a sure detriment.

Here in all candor is the answer owed to the two questions asked on the paper by the Honorable Signore Counsellor Gavard to Domenico Aldini and which in substance is the same as given to him spontaneously before receiving the said questions on paper; with the greatest respect I have the honor to say

Of Your Most Illustrious Lordship’s Devoted Obedient Servant Domenico Aldini
Florence 17 August 1776

5. Response and Memorandum of Giuseppe Gavard


A few days after the Answers to the Questions written by Domenico Aldini, Counselor Gavard is able to forward his response letter to the Grand Duke, with a memorandum on the investigation he carried out.
2. Department. Stamped paper. Playing Cards
V. [See?] Protocol of 23 September 1776 by the Secretary of Schmidveiller, No. 14

Royal Highness
In execution of the Order in a note from Counselor Angelo Tavanti marked on the 12. of June last [p.mo p.to = prossimo passato], I give myself the honor with the hereby enjoined Memorandum to give an account to Your Royal Highness of the diligence I have taken to come to clarity various accusations given in an anonymous representation about Domenico Aldini, Principal Minister of the respective [Public] Enterprise of Playing Cards and Stamped Paper.

I have not been able to find in Domenico Aldini's behavior that grave sinfulness indicated by the accuser's risky expressions; it only seems to me that he has rather in some part lacked the zeal and that scrupulous delicacy that is typical of a minister who has no exceptions, which [is a] sin against faithfulness.

Therefore, if we do not want to consider the true mortification that he felt from the accusations brought against him to the Royal Throne as a sufficient punishment for Aldini, I believe that a serious warning could be added to him to be more cautious and less interested for the future, especially since after the discovery of what passed between him and the card makers, I have taken such measures that there is no need to fear further inconvenience for the Enterprise.

However, on this occasion I must not fail to explain to Your Royal Highness that Aldini, due to his disconcerted health and current unhappy physical state, is certainly no longer able to provide exact and assiduous service as would be necessary, application of his signature [being] noticeably harmful to him, to the point that he cannot even countersign the cards with his own signature, taking advantage of the hand of the helper.

And prostrate at the foot of the royal throne I claim myself
Of Your Royal Highness Most Humble Servant and subject Giuseppe Gavard
Florence 26. August 1776
Attached to the letter we find the following long Memorandum, in which Gavard replies point by point to all the anonymous accusations.
MEMORANDUM. To clarify, whether six counts of accusation are sustained against Domenico Aldini, principal Minister of the [Public] Enterprise of Playing Cards and Stamped Paper, in an anonymous representation made to HRH, and sent to me with the injunction of His Excellency the Signore Counselor Angelo Tavanti dated 12 June 1776, and marked with No. 1, with the order to express my feelings, I practiced the diligence that I will mention below as I report each head of the accusations.

5
First. It is said that the aforementioned Minister has an interest with the card makers of two percent above the cards, which he takes for the General Administration.

There are three playing card makers in Florence, namely Zanobi Rossi, Pietro Molinelli, and the Jew Emanuelle Sacerdote under the name of Salvadore Tognacci.

The first two, making cards of better quality, sell a greater quantity of them to the General Administration than the Jew, who established the factory a short time ago with Tognacci, who went bankrupt; Aldini has not received any recognition [i.e. gifts] from this last [card maker], which deserves to be noted.

When Rossi was questioned whether Aldini himself had any interest with [i.e. emolument from] him, he immediately replied that from the first time, when Aldini succeeded Molinelli in the Cards Contract, he [Aldini] had received two percent on cards without a stamp that were delivered or sold, that is to say, that out of every one hundred dozens of unstamped packs of cards, he received two dozens: which Participation may have accrued about five scudi a year, adding, however, that from the year 1774 onward the same Aldini renounced this emolument.

When Molinelli was similarly questioned on the same subject, he replied that he had always granted Aldini one percent on the low cards alone sold to him [Aldini], that is to say, that for every hundred dozen decks of said cards, he gave him one dozen without stamp, which is worth 4.16.- L[ire], and this lasted until the year 1774, in which Aldini desisted from collecting said participation, which was much less than that granted by Rossi, since for Molinelli it extended only to the low cards, and at one percent. [Low cards = decks smaller than minchiate and “grandi” cards, and with only 40 cards.]

I subsequently asked Aldini if it was true that he received from card makers Rossi and Molinelli a certain percentage of the cards he had purchased from them both at the time of the General Contract and during the Supervising Administration; and the same not only immediately confessed in words how the matter had happened; but also gave me the defense, which is found in the attached sheets of No. 2. under the date of 17 August 1776, where he narrates that on the principle that he obtained for himself the Card Stamp Concession, which he then had to cede to that of Masson, card makers Molinelli and Rossi granted him the aforementioned respective emolument, especially in view that he did not erect a new card factory, which would have prejudiced them, as indeed it could have done.

Aldini therefore continued to receive the aforementioned participation during the respective General Contracts, not only because he always believed he had been prejudiced in the aforementioned transfer, considering himself as the main Conductor of this Enterprise, but also because having established as strictly as possible the prices of the cards that the card makers sold to the Enterprise, no prejudice resulted from it to the Interested Parties. Therefore, with the same maxim, he continued to receive the above-divided small participation even in the early years of the watchful General Administration until the year 1774, when he spontaneously renounced it.

The object was not in itself of great importance; but once the aforementioned participation was out of the way, it was possible to obtain from the card makers some small reductions in some of the prices of the cards already fixed, as I was able to persuade Rossi to reduce the price of the deck of cards lower by four denari, and six denari for minchiate, and similarly inducing Molinelli to reduce the respective price of the one and the other by four denari; and if it appears that on minchiate I have reduced Rossi’s by two denari more than Molinelli’s, this derives from the price initially set with Rossi himself always having been two denari higher, given that it is expected that his cards are better than those of other manufacturers. If we consider the quantity of cards supplied in the year 1775, the above-mentioned respective decrease in the price of the same results in 122 L[ire] to the advantage of the Enterprise, a sum much higher than the participation or emolument that the card makers granted to Aldini.

Having therefore not only spontaneously desisted from the year 1774 from receiving the aforementioned participation as before, but still candidly confessing all the rest, it does not seem to me that he can be accused of fraud, but rather of having failed to that scrupulous delicacy, which is proper to every honored, zealous, and disinterested minister, who must study and procure all the advantages of whoever keeps him provided for in his service.

It would not have been possible to become aware of the previously mentioned small interest that passed between Aldini and the card makers, if the card makers themselves had not revealed it to someone, complaining in a certain way about this burden, especially after the increase in the price of materials which are used for the manufacture of cards. For greater security, and against the method consistently followed from the first of January 1750 to the present, I have decided to no longer leave the task of providing the cards to Aldini alone; rather, in agreement with me, every time he buys with the intervention of the Accountant and the Warehouse Keeper, according to the needs of the Administration.

2nd. It is said that Aldini places in Input [Entrata] large entries at the end of each Quarter [of the year], so that the card makers pay less than their stamped amount, and also in advance before the cards are stamped and delivered to the respective warehouse.

This accusation is baseless; When the card makers want to have the cards stamped, the Minister makes a Policy [i.e. statement] on the quantity and quality of the same: he records it in his Input and Output book: He charges the card makers for the amount of the stamp, according to the number and quality of the cards to be stamped: he consigns said Policy to the Warehouse Keeper assigned to attend the Stamp in the Rooms of the Fiscal Office. The cards are counted. The same Policy remains with the Ministers of the Fiscal Office, who at the end of the year make an examination and also register them.

6
I have established that the same Policy passes into the hands of the Accountant before it is brought to the Tax Office by the Warehouse Keeper. At the end of each quarter, once an account has been taken of how much the card makers owe for the stamp duty, and of the amount of cards sold by them to the Administration, the appropriate mandates for payment to the Cashier's Desk [?: Cassa] are drawn up by the Accountant, which is not administered by Aldini.

3rd. It is said that he poorly maintains the account books on stamped paper and playing cards: that it is full of errors, scribbles, and scratchings to make it say what he wants.

As for the cards, the insubstantiality of this accusation is sufficiently evident from the tenor of the previous article, and for the supposed unsuitability to occur, the Minister and the Warehouse Keeper would have to be in perfect agreement, which is not likely.

The slander then becomes greater with respect to the writing on the stamped paper, as will be observed below in Article 6.

4th. It is said that he carries out a continual and illicit trade in cards, selling, having sold, and exchanging defective cards for good ones, which he gets from the Administration’s warehouse.

As regards the exchange of the defective cards, Warehouse Keeper Fond positively declared to me that Aldini never sought this, therefore the accusation in this part is false.

As regards the particular sale of cards, which the aforementioned Aldini makes on his own behalf, having questioned him about it, I received his candid confession in the aforementioned sheets marked No. 2, where he adduces that his sale of the Cards is not private; they are stamped: the greater the sale of the same, the greater becomes the Product of the Stamp on which the Privative [Monopoly Concession] Decree descends. This gives the Enterprise an advantage and not a detriment, since the same loses on the sale and only profits in measure of the greater tax revenue, to which many card dealers contribute.

All these reasons are admissible as far as the interests of the Enterprise are concerned; but I only find that such particular business is contrary to delicacy and is not suitable for a Minister supported by the Enterprise itself, who always causes suspicion of himself to those who are not well informed of the internal system of this small Administration. Therefore I told Aldini that it was in his dignity to renounce the above-mentioned particular sale, which is then reduced to a small object, his only gain consisting in obtaining from the card makers some small relief on the price of the cards which he buys from them in small quantities, but the stamp duty paid by the card makers themselves always remains intact.

5th. It is observed that Aldini received from HRH 282 L[ire] per year more than his usual provision, so that he could pay an assistant, and that he kept a certain Cammillo Targioni for three years without paying him but only with flattering him to get him a job, which he Targioni did not even obtain.

With a Benevolent Edict dated 11 June 1770, Aldini was granted an increase in his provision of 282 L[ire]. per year, so that he could keep an assistant of his choice, and at his expense. He really used the aforementioned Targioni, nor did the general Administration care to know what conditions had been agreed between them. Targioni, however, resorted to S.A.R. [His Royal Highness], complaining about Aldini, and in a long notice of mine dated 16 Feb. 1773, I explained all the circumstances of the affair. Aldini subsequently made use of another assistant, against whose choice I complained, since it was a little boy, whose accuracy there was no need to compromise; But S.A.R. having, by Edict dated 28 December 1775, made Aldini cease the improvement by the aforementioned 282 L[ire], having assigned them another assistant paid by the Administration. The accusation made against Aldini in this Article does not seem to me to deserve further attention or discussion.

6th. Finally, it is said that Aldini mismanages the stamped paper, receiving certain gifts, by which he admits paper that is inferior to the samples, with no need for Warehouse Keeper Fond to make noises and complain about it.

The Minister absolutely cannot do harm on this item, if not in this capacity coming to an agreement with the Warehouse Keeper and with the Selectors to receive poor quality paper, and inferior to the Samples: The prices of the paper were fixed after a sort of auction with the most rigorous diligence: When the paper arrives in Florence from Colle, it is immediately handed over to the Warehouse Keeper; the record is well kept by the principal Minister, the Warehouse Keeper, and the Accountant respectively; only once did it appear to Warehouse Keeper Fond that a batch of paper was not entirely perfect; but since the appraisal had been carried out by several experts and several expert paper [or card: Cartai] makers in my presence, it was truly recognized that the same was not to be rejected. The major justification to be given on this matter is that at the time of the current Stamped Paper Manager, the Appeals, which previously were frequent regarding the quality of stamped paper, were no longer heard, and that the exceptions given few times, some being referable to the poor quality of the ink and the manner of the writing, rather than to an essential imperfection in the stamped paper.

26. Aug. 1776 Giuseppe Gavard

6. Resolution note

The latest document on the matter is a short note without a heading, recipient, or sender, written quickly without giving care to the handwriting, but clearly of an official nature.


7
S.A.R. [His Royal Highness] wants the matter of the accusations brought against Domenico Aldini, Minister of Playing Cards and Stamped Paper, to be completed with a serious warning to him.

S.A.R. Venerated [because it comes from the duke himself] Resolution of 12 Sept. 1776 N° 26. – V. P. S. (?) 23. Sept. 1776, N° 14.
And so “it’s a done deal.” The serious accusations have been denied. The Grand Duke accepts Counselor Gavard's proposal, but accepts it in its harsher version. According to the counselor, Aldini's hierarchical superior, the mortification suffered by the minister for the accusations and the subsequent investigation would also have been sufficient. The Grand Duke, or someone on his behalf, instead judges that a serious warning is necessary.

The fact is that the discovery, only following the anonymous accusations, of Aldini's less than exemplary conduct ends up directly affecting Gavard himself, who only now realizes the situation and takes initiatives aimed at doing more to regulate the relationship between the minister and the card makers. If things had been working badly for a quarter of a century, a severe punishment for Aldini would logically have entailed a punishment, however reduced, for Gavard too. It is for this reason that in such cases it is customary to entrust the investigation to a third-party judge.

7. Conclusions

From the investigation into Domenico Aldini we obtain quite precise indications, both explicit and implicit, on the control of the production of playing cards in Florence in the second half of the eighteenth century and in particular on the figure of Domenico Aldini, first contractor and then main minister of the sector.

The defense of the minister by his superior (which appears to be a defense rather than an objective investigation into the various accusations) suggests that between the lines Aldini's behavior went well beyond his official duties. Aldini received a salary far higher than that of all his employees. In the same 1776, the distribution of the annual provisions of the office was as follows, in lire: Aldini 1700, Manetti his assistant 400, Fond warehouse keeper 200, Soldi shipper 60, Brunelleschi stamper 53.6.8. (note 4).

Evidently, Aldini intended to earn even more. The situation was made embarrassing by the fact that while the "principal minister" was more or less illegally supplementing his large salary, his employees, who were aware of it, forwarded requests to the Grand Duke to obtain small bonuses or salary increases, regularly pointing out the condition of poverty in which their family found themselves.

One of his tasks, perhaps the main one, was to write his signature on one playing card of all the decks of cards put on the market. For this reason, he also resorted to an assistant who signed "Domenico Aldini" in his place; the assistant was paid first indirectly (with an increase in Aldini's salary which in theory, but not in practice, had to be fully transferred to the assistant) and then directly by the administration. Furthermore, it appears that Aldini had also found ways to increase his already generous salary, thanks to backroom agreements with Florentine card makers whereby he could receive from them, and then sell, packs of cards for free or at a reduced price.

Perhaps the anonymous accusations were more striking than they should have been, but certainly almost all of Aldini’s and Gavard's justifications appear rather weak to us.

Florence, 21.11.2023

---------------
4 F. Pratesi, Playing-Card Production in Florence, Tricase 2018, p. 23; https://www.naibi.net/A/209-1775TUSC-Z.docx; http://trionfi.com/ev09
Last edited by mikeh on 17 Jan 2024, 02:14, edited 1 time in total.

Reform of Stamp Duty [Bollo] on Cards

25
Here is the coup de grace, relegating Aldini "to his rest," as his superior puts it, streamlining the operation so as to end the system of the stamp concession, keeping the stamp and its revenue but not the generous pay envelope of its former head with opportunities for even more income through covert manipulation. In the process we learn more about the system in effect - a kind of transition between two worlds - and the one replacing it. Franco tells the story through its documents.

Again the Grand Duke is the son of Holy Roman Empress Maria Theresa, now 33 years of age. Again I am grateful to Franco for his very necessary (for me) help. His original of 31 October 2023 is at https://www.naibi.net/A/BOLLO1781.pdf. For additional information, see the preceding post.

Florence 1781: reform of stamp duty on cards

Franco Pratesi

1. Introduction
In Inventory N/83 of the section Miscellany of Finance A in the State Archives of Florence we read: “284 Playing Cards. Various papers concerning stamp duty [Bollo, term that mainly refers to the stamp itself] - 1766-86.” A search in this bundle of documents allowed me to find useful information to define the methods used by the Grand Duchy’s administration in Tuscany to control the production and trade of playing cards. As for stamped paper, controlled in parallel by the same offices of the Second Department of the General Administration, the system was based on the stamp [bollo], which allowed both the collection of the tax due and the exact control of the quality and quantity of playing cards produced and sold.

The traditional procedure was not very different from what was occurring in other states and was based on a five-year and then ten-year contract with a contractor who supervised all the necessary operations. However, it was also an unusual contract, because the contractor Domenico Aldini had long since transferred the actual function to the General Contractor. Among the various reforms introduced in the administration by Grand Duke Pietro Leopoldo was that of the concession of playing cards: at the beginning of 1781, immediately after the expiry of the contract, the situation changed substantially, insofar as the contract for the concession was not renewed, and control over playing cards was transferred directly to the General Administration, together with that over stamped paper.

From the documentation found, important details are obtained, copied, or summarized below.

2. The previous situation
After other similar contracts, the last one before the events in question was that in force for nine years from 1 January 1772. About this contract, a printed copy of the Notification of the Announcement can be found among the documents in the file studied. I reproduce it below, also to better define the role of Domenico Aldini, a key figure in the relevant administration.
NOTIFICATION
OF THE ANNOUNCEMENT ON THE PLAYING CARDS STAMP.
The Most Illustrious Signor Fiscal Lieutenant Ipolito Scaramucci in this part as Superintendent of the affairs of the Playing Cards Stamp, with approval and express commandment of His Royal Highness [S. A. R. – Sua Altezza Reale] as per his Benevolent Edict [Benigno Rescripto] dated 24 December 1771, lets be publicly announced and notified, as was confirmed to Domenico of the late Carl'Antonio Aldini of Florence, the Playing Cards Stamp Contract for nine years starting from the first of January 1772, in which time no one will be allowed to retain, transport, sell, or use playing cards unless stamped with the particular stamp of said Contractor, in the form that will be declared below.
II. The Stamp to be affixed by the aforementioned Contractor will contain, as usual, a Cipher [Cifra] expressing the three letters A.D.A. with the legend around it of Bollo delle Carte di Toscana [Tuscany Cards Stamp], and in addition to said Stamp there will also be the Contractor's signature, which will say Domenico Aldini; and both the Stamp and the signature must be applied, as much to Minchiate on Card Twenty-One, as to the Cards of Spades and Clubs [i.e. French-style cards – trans.], on the Jack of Diamonds, as much the fine Cards of Swords and Batons, on the Page of Swords, as to the ordinary cards of Swords and Batons, on the Knight of Batons, and finally, as much to the Cards of Ombre called Spanish-style, on the King of Coins.
…..
Arcangelo Cappucci under-Chancellor in the Fiscal Office [Fisco].
Published in Florence this 31st December 1771.
by me Giuseppe Vannucchi, Official Crier [i.e. maker of announcements – trans.]
3. Preparations for change
The reform requested by the Grand Duke was not simple, and several communications were necessary between the offices involved and with the Grand Duke himself to clarify the conditions. It was a matter of explaining in every detail the functioning of the system and proposing the most appropriate ways to introduce the required changes. For us, these communications are very useful to let us know with


2
precision the procedures adopted, and even the traditional rewards given to the staff and managers.
General Administration
2nd Department
Playing cards

Excellency
Replying to the most revered Note of Your Excellency dated yesterday, with which you favor to ask me whether the 2nd Department of the General Administration can meet the task of conserving the Playing Cards Stamp, and of stamping said playing cards, to remove this interference to the Fiscal Office appointed up to now, I give myself the honor of telling Your Excellency that the aforementioned unification can be held without dismay. But, to account for the future security of the service on such article, I consider it my duty to identify below the method that is currently followed and what I think should be observed in the future.
The makers of playing cards, three in number, [note 1] each have their respective printing blocks for the figures [i.e. minchiate and the courts of “low cards”] of said cards.
These initial printing blocks are kept in the General Administration under the key of the respective manufacturer, who comes to print his cards under the eyes of the Keeper of the Warehouse of the Enterprise [Azienda = modern Azienda], where a register is kept of everything that is printed, to get validation if necessary.
After this operation, said manufacturers take their cards back to their workshops to perfect their manufacture, and when they want to stamp them, they send them to the General Administration with a Policy, in which the respective quality and quantity is expressed.
Once the cards have been received by the Administration, Signore Domenico Aldini affixes his signature to one card of each deck in accordance with the Law. He then takes the register of said Policy, as made by the Enterprise’s accountant, to charge each card maker for the amount of the Stamp Duty (which is subsequently paid by them every three months).
Once the aforementioned operations have been completed in the Enterprise’s office, the cards are sent to the Fiscal Office, with the aforementioned card maker's Policy, accompanied by the Warehouse Keeper Francesco Fond, to be stamped in his presence by Filippo Brunelleschi, one of the Custodians of the Fiscal Office, where the Stamp is kept under two keys, one of which remains in the Fiscal Office itself, the other with the aforementioned Warehouse Keeper, or with the principal Minister [i.e. official] of the Office of the Enterprise.
When the cards are stamped, the stamp is put back under the keys, and the above-mentioned Policy of the card maker is kept in the Fiscal Office. The card maker takes back his cards and then sells them at his pleasure.
Following the aforementioned unification with the General Administration, I would think of keeping the stamp under two different keys, one of which I would keep with me, and I would deliver the other to the Minister of the Enterprise. I would be willing to have the cards stamped in the room of the suppressed Office of Flours and Aggregate Items [Partite] and to rely on the responsibility of the Custodian Antonio Mari, who is honest and faithful, to have the cards stamped in the presence of Warehouse Keeper Fond, as there is no place in the Office of Stamped Paper for a similar operation, which otherwise is not suitable to be done by the Ministers of the Office itself.
On this occasion, I still give myself the honor of submitting to Your Excellency the attached Note of Cash Bonuses and Cards in Kind, which this Enterprise distributes every year to various Ministers of the Fiscal Office, also including the provision paid to Custodian Brunelleschi, up to now the stamper of the cards, and this by virtue of the Sovereign Edicts mentioned in the same Note, reverently praying Your Excellency to deign to understand from His Royal Highness [S.A.R.] whether the aforementioned administrations must continue after the new Regulations given for the Ministers of said Fiscal Office, especially since Signore Fiscal Lieutenant Betti said he could not receive the 56 L[ire] bonus assigned to his deceased predecessor for Christmas without a new Sovereign order.
And with the most distinct respect I claim myself
Of Your Excellency,

Most Devoted and Obedient Servant
Giuseppe Gavard
From the General Desk of the 2nd Department
Of the Administration of the R. Incomes on 23 January 1778
The letter, as always on stamped paper, is addressed to His Excellency Counselor Angelo Tavanti and contains a separate sheet with "the required Note of Bonuses in Cash and Cards in Kind".
__________________
1. Zanobi Rossi, Pietro Molinelli and Salvatore Tognacci. (F. Pratesi, Playing-Card Production in Florence. Tricase 2018; https://www.naibi.net/A/209-1775TUSC-Z.docx)

3
Note of Cash Bonuses and Provisions that are paid each year to the Ministers of the Fiscal Office in relation to the Concession of the Playing Cards Stamp

--------For Berlingaccio [last Thursday of Carnival]
To the Signore Fiscal Auditor------------------------------------------L.-----30.-.-
To the Tavolaccino [an errand-boy], and Boys
[Garzoni = young interns] of the Fiscal Office------------------------------4.13.4
---------For Easter of Resurrection
To the Signore Chancellor of the Fiscal Office------------------------------8.-.-
To the Tavolaccino, and above-mentioned Boys----------------------------4.13.4
---------For Saint John’s
To the above-mentioned Chancellor------------------------------------------8.-.-
To the Tavolaccino, and above-mentioned Boys----------------------------4.13.4
-----------For Mid-August
To the Tavolaccino, and abovementioned Boys-----------------------------4.13.4
-----------For All Saints
To the above-mentioned Signore Chancell-----------------------------------6.-.-
To the Tavolaccino, and above-mentioned Boys-----------------------------4.13.4
---------For Christmas
To the Signore Fiscal Lieutenant----------------------------------------------58.-.-
To the Tavolaccino, and above-mentioned Boys-----------------------------4.13.4
To the Butler of the Signore Fiscal Auditor-----------------------------------3.-.-
To the Servant of the Signore Fiscal Lieutenant-----------------------------3.-.-

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------L. 144.-.-
Annual provision to Filippo Brunelleschi
---------Stamper in the Rooms of the Fiscal Office--------------------------53.6.8

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------L. 197.6.8

The aforementioned Bonuses were approved by His Royal Highness [S.A.R.] with Benevolent Edict dated 11 January 1769.

It should be noted that every year the Playing Card Stamp Office supplies the quantities described below free of charge to the following Ministers of the Fiscal Office by virtue of the Benevolent Edicts of 19 October and 19 December 1768.
To the Signore Fiscal Auditor the number of decks of both minchiate and low cards [i.e. ordinary decks] that he needs for his consumption.
To the Signore Fiscal Lieutenant: the same.
To the Chancellor of the Fiscal Office: 8 decks of minchiate, and 8 decks of low cards.
Perhaps this Note deserves a comment for those who are not familiar with the situation at the time. If one thinks with today's mentality, one will immediately be able to notice the clear disparity between the rewards given to employees and managers, but one must remember that back then trade union demands did not exist; indeed, trade unions themselves were . . . in a distant future. Confirmation of this situation is obtained by reading the numerous petitions on stamped paper (present in other files of the same archive unit) that the employees submit directly to the Grand Duke to obtain some gratification or reward for long service, always keeping in mind the situation of poverty and the hardship in which their family lived.

When the contract deadline approaches, the exchange of official correspondence becomes more complete and detailed, with new data and proposals.
General Administration
2nd Department
Playing cards

Royal Highness
Since 10 November, 1751, the income from the Playing Cards Stamp Duty was, at [the] favor of the Royal Fiscal Office, released for the annual fee of L. 11200 = =, and for five years, beginning on January 1, 1752, to Domenico Aldini, who on December 12th of the same year 1751, ceded his rights to General Contractor Masson.

4
With Edict dated 2 June 1756, the same account [Partita] was granted to General Contractor Diodati under the name of the before-mentioned Aldini until the whole of December 1762, for the annual fee of L. 12,600 = = , and the same continued to be joined to the following General Concession of Almano, compliant with Art. 10 of the Contract signed and approved on 29 April 1762, which was to last until the end of December 1771.
Finally, with Edict dated 24 December of said year 1771, it was ordered that for another nine years the System practiced up to then be observed for the management or administration of said Account.
On the occasion of each renewal of the Directive, the Fiscal Lieutenant had an Announcement published in his name, i.e. on 14 December 1751, 18 December 1756, 10 December 1762, and 31 December 1771, conforming to the copy of the last renewal, which I present here annexed to Your Royal Highness.
In the first paragraph of the Edict of 26 August 1768, and in the first Article of the Regulation signed by Your Royal Majesty [R.A.V.] on the 7th of the following September, you were already pleased to order that all the income then gathered to the general Concession was to be administered in the subsequent section on behalf of the Royal Treasury. And in the Note of the Joint Accounts that was included in the aforementioned Regulation, the income from the Stamp Duty on Playing Cards was described by the annual sum of L. 12,600 = =, payable to the Fiscal Office.
Since the management of said income, confirmed to Domenico Aldini in the aforementioned Notification dated 31 December 1771, must expire on 31 December 1771, I give myself the honor of humbling to the Supreme Intention of V.A R. my reverent sentiment regarding the variations, which, given the vigilant system of general administration of all the Royal Incomes [rendite], and of other Accounts already united to the same, I would believe that we can do something about the said Income from the Card Stamp Duty, if it pleases you to keep for the Royal Fiscal Office this Chapter of Income, and you do not wish to hand over its administration to the same Fiscal Office, and remove it from the department assigned to me [i.e. General Administration].
I therefore find the name of a Contractor, who is not actually a Contractor, as useless as his signature on the stamped cards, and this is consistent with the method used for the stamped paper, which is much more important for all economic and political purposes than playing cards. Furthermore, by ceasing that hatred which the public commonly has against the Contractor, or whoever bears that name, due to the price and quality of the cards, even if neither one nor the other depends on him, and knowing that this account really belongs entirely to the Royal Treasury, greater respect will certainly result from part of the public, and perhaps a greater sale of said cards will follow.
V.A.R. already deigned with Benevolent Edict of 7 March 1778 to order that the cards should no longer be stamped in the rooms of the Fiscal Office, but in one of those attached to this general desk of my department, with the precautions then prescribed, which was punctually carried out, and is still being carried out, without causing the slightest inconvenience.
If the same system continues in the future, and when there is a fear that the card stamp, which is jealously guarded, could be counterfeited by some Particular, a risk however that is equally run for the Stamped Paper, one could rely on some minister [official] of this General Accounting Office, without giving him the title of Contractor, the duty to continually affix his signature to the aforementioned stamped cards, in place of Domenico Aldini, of whom we can no longer make an asset due to his continuous infirmities, which oblige him to rely on another hand for almost the entire year for said signature.
When it pleases V.A.R. to approve these respectful Propositions of mine, it will be necessary for conformity to modify in some parts the provisions of the Announcement to be published, either by the Fiscal Auditor, since it concerns Fiscal Income, or by the Supreme Court of Justice, cognizant of the transgressions concerning the aforementioned Playing Card Duty Stamp, or rather by the Fiscal Lieutenant, if the method up to now adopted on this article seems to Your Highness be regular and of his best service, still having to warn that in said Announcement, there should be cited the Benevolent Edict of 18 August 1777, officially communicated by the Suppressed Grand Ducal Chamber on the 21st following, regarding the moderation of the punishment for transgressions of playing cards that do not go beyond two decks.
Imploring the Supreme determinations of V.A.R. [Your Royal Highness] on the object of this reverent Participation of mine, so that the appropriate provisions can be given before the end of the present year, prostrate at the foot of the Royal Throne I claim myself
Of Your Royal Highness
Most Humble Servant and Subject
Giuseppe Gavard
Florence 16 November 1780
Correspondence proceeds in one way, as outgoing mail is stored in this file and not incoming mail, but from the context, we can easily go back to the evidence coming in, directly or indirectly, from the Grand Duke himself, as in the secretary’s note cited in the following communication.


5
General Administration
2nd Department
Playing cards

Royal Highness
Having been pleased to Your Royal Highness to order by means of a note from Secretary Francesco Antonio Bonfini, signed on the 25th of November last, that I reduce the new Announcement to be published on Playing Cards in the form I deem appropriate, I give myself the honor of presenting to you the attached Project, in which I have substantially followed the Order of the last Announcement of 31 December 1771 in those parts which did not appear to me to be susceptible to variation.
And when Your Royal Highness deigns to approve the creation of the new stamp in the way proposed by me, it will be appropriate to quickly order its engraving by Luigi Siriès Engraver of the Dies of the Mint, and on January 1, 1781, I will defer to the Royal Secretariat of Finance the old stamps, which are kept under double lock in my office, where the one that is currently in use is taken as cards to be stamped arise, which happens almost every day.
For both the Principal Minister of said Enterprise, who has asked for his rest, and the Minister in charge of stamping the cards, I will humbly address to V.A.R. in another Participation [i.e. official note] of this day [i.e. today] my reverent sentiments as prescribed to me in the aforementioned note.

And prostrate at the foot of the Royal Throne I claim myself
Of Your Royal Highness
Most humble Servant and subject
Giuseppe Gavard
Florence 4 December 1780.
4. The reformed system
The conclusion of the negotiations between the offices was that the requested reform could be carried out and suitable conditions found, including new premises and new stamping staff. Thus, as a result, there was the new announcement with the following Notification, published in print, which came into force on January 1, 1781.
NOTIFICATION
The Most Illustrious Lord Auditor of Regalia and Royal Possessions, in execution of the Most Venerable Edict of His Royal Highness [S.A.R.] dated 19 December 1780, lets be publicly notified, as ending with this month of December, the Playing Cards Stamp Concession under name of Domenico Aldini. The R.A.S. desires that the Monopoly of the Stamp of the aforementioned cards, from the first of January 1781 onwards, must be held directly on behalf of, and in the name of, the General Administration of his Royal Incomes [Rendite] in the manner and with the conditions that follow.
From the first day of January 1781 into the future, the stamp to be affixed to playing cards will contain a figure expressing the letters A. G., denoting General Administration, with the words around it Bollo delle Carte di Toscana [Tuscany Cards Stamp], which stamp will be affixed, as regards minchiate, on card 27, and with respect to spades and clubs [i.e. French-style cards], on the jack of hearts.
…..
From the Court of Regalia and Royal Possessions
The 30. December 1780.
Gaspero Domenico Paver Chancellor

5. Other information

In the same file, there is also a loose sheet, without a date but clearly from those years (i.e., between the seventies and eighties of the eighteenth century), with the tariffs for entry, exit, and transit of playing cards in Tuscany. It should be noted that the outgoing ones do not pay duty, but we know from other documents that only minchiate cards could go out like this - with a specific license and confirmation of exit from the state within fifteen days - while the other cards could go out without paying duty, as they were exported only on the condition of being stamped already.
Article
of the General Rates of Tuscan Tariffs relating to playing cards
---------Playing cards
---------------- One Hundred Pounds [Libbre, a unit of weight]
---------For introduction, sixteen Lire--------------------------- L 16.-.-


6
-----------For export, they do not pay tariff---------------------- -.-.-
-----------For Transit ten Soldi-------------------------------------- -.10.-

Playing cards coming from outside the United Territory cannot be introduced without License even in case they are just passing through, in accordance with the Law of 31 December 1771. Except for the transit of playing cards coming from the lower Province [i.e. Siena] or destined for the same, which in this case will not need any License, in accordance with the Edict of 11 April 1778.
In the same years as the changes mentioned above, there was also the new entrance of playing card manufacturers in addition to the three traditional ones. In one case it is just a factory changing its name. On 5 December 1776 Gavard communicated his opinion to the Grand Duke on the plea of the card maker Salvadore Tognacci. In 1772 Tognacci had obtained "the power to erect a playing card factory in Florence" and had started that business in partnership with Emanuelle Sacerdote, who had put up all the capital. Subsequently, the same Sacerdote also assumed management of the factory, and now Tognacci asks that the factory continue its activity under the sole name of Emanuelle Sacerdote. Gavard concludes "I don't see that there can be any difficulty in granting the requests of the petitioners, especially since Emmanuelle Sacerdote is capable of carrying out the manufacturing in question well." But we also find two other new factories. In particular, we read Gavard's favorable opinion, dated 22 April 1780, that a favorable response should be given to the plea of Niccolò Canonici "who asks for the Grace to open a New Playing Card Factory." On 9 August 1780, Gavard repeated himself in the same terms regarding a similar request from Domenico Falugi. In both cases, it is required that this occur "with the same obligations and burdens imposed on the current manufacturers of said cards." (In reality, in other documents from the following years, we will encounter the Falugi factory but not that of Canonici.)

6. Conclusion
In the Grand Duchy of Tuscany, upon the expiry of the contract for the concession of the playing card stamp on 1 January 1781, a new system came into force whereby the concession was abolished and the entire procedure of taxation and control on playing cards passed under the direct supervision of the General Administration. The documentation preserved in the State Archives of Florence relating to this passage allows us to know in detail the offices involved, the procedures adopted, and the staff involved.

Florence, 31.10.2023
Last edited by mikeh on 17 Jan 2024, 02:22, edited 2 times in total.

Cortona 1767-1781: Playing cards in the customs

26
Here is a translation of one more of Franco's essays, this one transcribing correspondence from Florence to Cortona about supplying stamped cards from the former to the latter. The authors are the same Aldini and Gavard, in all their officiousness, as in previous posts. In this correspondence we learn more about the production and distribution of playing cards, including minchiate, in the Grand Duchy of Tuscany. Franco's original is at https://naibi.net/A/CORTONA.pdf. Translation done with the assistance of Google Translate (of course with numerous corrections required) and more especially Franco. Remaining errors are mine; please let me know when you see one.

Cortona 1767-1781 – Playing Cards in Customs

Franco Pratesi

1. Introduction and documents studied
The material used for this study is contained in a file in the last element, the thirtieth, of the series on the subordinate customs [Dogane], a collection in the State Archives of Florence. In the relevant Inventory N/379-VII, it is indicated as follows.
No. 30 “Different contact details regarding the Cortona Customs.” Contains three files entitled: "stamped paper - letters addressed to the Minister of Cortona". “playing cards-letters addressed to the Minister of Cortona.” “Duty from contracts of Arezzo and Cortona” 1767 – 1781. [note 1]
For my research there was therefore only one file present, with around fifty letters sent to the minister of Cortona by Domenico Aldini, the person who for years had been in charge of the control of playing cards in Florence.

One of the subordinate customs [offices] was installed in Cortona, as in other even smaller cities. The main customs was obviously in Florence, but there was a network of secondary ones in the major Tuscan cities, such as Arezzo, Livorno, Pisa, Pistoia and Siena. The subordinate customs were at a lower level, and of these there are those of Volterra, Cortona, Pietrasanta, Colle, Firenzuola, Pietrabuona, Ponte a Taviano, and a few others in smaller localities.

The letters arriving in Cortona from Florence provide us with a variety of useful information on the control of playing cards transferred, depending on local requests, from the main warehouse in Florence to that of the Cortona customs. We thus obtain the number of decks used in Cortona and the surrounding area, but also related information that lets us inside the administration and the control methods followed.

2. The quantity of cards
Years ago I found a record of the cards sent from Florence to various Tuscan cities in 1791, a few years after the period of interest here, and I reproduce a summary table of the situation below. [note 2]
Image
________________________
1. https://archiviodistatofirenze.cultura. ... lterne.pdf.
2. Playing Card Production in Florence, Tricase 2018, p. 36.


2
As can be seen, Cortona does not appear among the Tuscan cities to which playing cards had been sent from Florence; perhaps in 1791 no new decks of ordinary cards and minchiate were sent to that city. However, in general, the ratio between minchiate and other types of cards remains significant. Precisely this ratio is what interests us, as can also be verified in the data found in Cortona in previous years, summarized in the following table.

-----------------------------------DOZENS OF CARDS [i.e. DECKS - current trans.]
----------------------------------------Year-Month / Low / Minchiate / Other
Image
* Six decks of local picchetto cards [not the same as French piquet - current trans.], which are used for the game of Twenty-One and will have to be sold at the rate of two paoli per deck [1 paolo = 8 crazie - current trans.].
** However, only the minchiate arrived.
^ Complete French-style – sold nine crazie per deck.
^^ In fact, half a dozen more cards and fewer minchiate are sent in compensation.
Some interesting information can be obtained from the table. The first is that the expectation of a 10:1 ratio between "normal" cards and minchiate cards is fully confirmed. It had been an almost constant ratio for quite a while, and we couldn't expect a very different situation, except perhaps a premature reduction in the game of minchiate. This decrease will become general throughout Tuscany, but only later. Roughly speaking, Cortona receives around twenty dozen decks of “normal” cards a year and, correspondingly, just over two dozen decks of minchiate.

The very limited presence of playing cards other than the low ones [i.e. the “normal” deck, here of 40 cards] may be a little surprising. In more than twelve years, only a dozen French-style packs and even only half a dozen 52-card picchetto packs, which also had a fair diffusion elsewhere. Here it is said that they were used for the game of Twenty-one, which evidently had only a very brief fashion (or authorization) in the area.


3
3. Replacement of defective or missing cards – in general
The procedure adopted to replace any defective or missing cards is clearly indicative of the meticulous attention dedicated to the matter, such as to make a simple playing card seem of great value. The following circular can be read in this regard.
Florence, 23 August 1776
To provide as much as possible for the interests of the General Administration in relation to the defective and worm-eaten cards frequently found in the respective locations, for which the method of returning them to this General Warehouse to be exchanged has been adopted, I have concluded that in future, when one, or two, or three, or even eight of the damaged cards are found in a deck of cards, and no more, only the damaged cards must be returned to the Principal Minister as such, retaining the remainder of the deck, because they [the damaged cards] are made completely similar again and then returned and replaced in the remainder of said deck of cards remaining in hand, etc.
If there is greater harm in a deck, in this case the entire deck will be sent back, another good one to be sent to compensate for the defective one.
If there are any missing cards in a deck of cards, then the defective deck must be sent back intact to the Principal Minister to be exchanged by the selling card maker.
It is in this manner, therefore, that Your Most Illustrious Lordship must behave; and with attention to acknowledgment that this letter has reached you, I remain with perfect esteem
Of Your Lordship
Most Devoted Obliged Servant
Giuseppe Gavard
A detail of this letter that is lost in the transcription is the fact that counselor Gavard, hierarchically superior, signs the letter, but his handwriting is identical to all those signed by Domenico Aldini. In short, it is clear, or at least very probable, that Gavard affixed his signature to a provision already prepared by the usual office in the main warehouse.

My personal impression is that the control over playing cards had taken on some maniacal characteristics: a playing card ends up being treated as if it were a banknote, and not of small denomination.

4. Strict control over cards
As a rule, the minister of Cortona writes to Domenico Aldini to request the supply of a precise number of dozens of decks of [“normal”] cards and minchiate as soon as he senses a danger that the local warehouse will run out of playing cards to be transferred to retailers who request them. Again in accordance with the now usual procedures, after a few days Aldini sends a letter advising that the requested cards have been sent and asking for confirmation of receipt. However, we note some cases in which the cards sent are fewer than those requested, and when this happens it does not happen without reason. Florence meddles in the affairs of the Cortona customs and demonstrates that the request made is greater than the need. This occurs in a few cases, such as the following.
Florence 25 February 1769
Monsieur,
. . . I sent you 10 dozen Low Cards and 2 dozen Minchiates, having limited myself in the latter because the consumption of them in the last year was of sixteen decks, with a remainder of twenty decks, it seems to me that said two dozen can be more than sufficient for you. …

Florence 23 November 1776
Before sending to Your Excellency the playing cards which you request from me with your letter dated 19th of the current month, please tell me, upon receipt of this letter, the precise quality and quantity of the said cards which are unsold there, since from your summary of accounts for the first semester, it is noted that as of the end of July, 341 Low Card decks and 36 Minchiate decks remained in existence [undistributed]; and that the output of said Semester consists of only 100 decks of the first and 36 decks of the second. So if the output has not grown out of proportion in the current semester, it would seem that there will still be cards for a long period of time; and since it has been seen from experience that the cards then go bad due to dirt and moths, it is therefore not advisable to load the respective card storage services [posti] more than necessary, for which reason it is precisely my duty to make the aforementioned request, and for no other reason, full of respect, I invariably state myself

4
Of Your Most Illustrious Lordship
Most Devoted Most Obliged Servant
Domenico Aldini

5. Replacement of defective or missing cards – a special case

It is worth reporting the documentation on a particular case in which the distance between the "theoretical" provisions and daily practice is felt. Despite all the prescribed attention, some errors become inevitable, and the bureaucracy enters into crisis.
Florence, 9 December 1776
. . . so said cards remained in Customs, where the appropriate shipment could not be made. Therefore you will receive them in the current week, and I will ensure that among them there are still six decks of Low Cards and two decks of Minchiate, which were returned to me due to being damaged. But if by chance they cannot be brought to good condition in time to be able to join them with said cards, do not worry, because in this case I will be concerned to get them to you as soon as they are in order. . . .

Florence, 26 December 1776
Your Most Illustrious Lordship sent back some time ago six decks of Low Cards and two decks of Minchiate, which were damaged, for me to return them to you in good condition.
Mr. Giuseppe Blais of Firenzuola sent me eight decks of Minchiate at the same time for the same reason.
In returning said cards, a mistake was made, because those that were supposed to come there [Cortona] went to Firenzuola, and those of Firenzuola came there.
In this state of affairs, I ask Your Excellency to send me six decks of Minchiate so that I can instead send you six decks of Low Cards, and in this way, the mistake made will be remedied, your attention to which I will be much obliged. I state myself of your Most Illustrious Lordship
Most Devoted Obliged Servant
Domenco Aldini

Florence 13 February 1777
Since the 26th of the month of December past, I wrote you another letter, of which you will find a copy attached. And since I have not yet received the appropriate response, I ask you to be pleased to give me said response and to implement the contents of the same, so that we can rid ourselves of the error that occurred in returning the cards there that were supposed to go to Firenzuola, instead of the ones you sent me; . . .
There is no end to this practice, also because in the meantime the minister Luigi Sergiuliani of Cortona customs had changed, so that it became necessary to summarize the general provisions regarding defective cards to the new minister Giuseppe Ruggeri. It seems that the relevant bureaucracy perhaps had to start from scratch.
Florence, 25 May 1778
Monsieur

With respect to worm-eaten and missing Cards, your Predecessor must have left you a Circular dated 23 August 1776 from this Counselor Gavard, in which it was essentially ordered that when in a deck of cards one or more defective cards, is found, up to the number eight, such defective cards must be sent to me, as they are to be redone, and returned to their respective location to be replaced in the remainder of the deck, which remains in the hands of the Minister or seller. If there are many defective cards in a deck of cards, the entire deck must be sent back to him to exchange, and a good one must be returned in compensation for the defective one.
Finally, when there are some missing ones in a deck, it is appropriate to send the whole deck back to me, if there are many missing, to be, as above, exchanged, etc. But in the case of a small shortage, it is sufficient to send back a card from the same deck, wrapped well in a sheet, explaining on the same sheet which cards are missing, and in this case these are redone here, similar in all respects on the reverse side to that sent to me as a sample; and then to return to the whole, to put it back in your respective deck.
In this manner, therefore, will you be able to behave when necessary; and full of esteem I state myself invariably
Devoted Obliged Servant
Domenico Aldini

5
6. Cards and minchiate outside the state
In the documentation of the file we also find useful information on the exportation of playing cards. In a letter from Aldini, the different procedures for ordinary cards and minchiate are clarified: the former must be exported already stamped, with the subsequent advantage of crossing the border with a minimum tax, like any goods; the latter can be exported without stamp duty, but it must be demonstrated that they left the State within 15 days of taking charge of them.
Most Illustrious Lordship Signore Prone [surname or abbreviation for a title?]

For [going] outside the State, cards without stamp duty are not allowed outside of Minchiate, and these are granted with a license from this Royal Fiscal Office, where whoever wants them must provide the Guarantor to bring within the prefixed deadline of 15 days the appropriate justifications that the said Minchiate were made to leave the State, under penalty of 300 gold scudi. So if Monsignor Mancini of Rome wants the said Minchiate, it is best for him to give the task here in Florence to some one of his correspondents, who, if necessary, will be directed by me to do what he needs to do. If you then want Low Cards, it is necessary that you take them stamped and have paid the appropriate duty on them, which is reduced to a small thing; because they are charged as goods, they have free transit. Which is what I owe to your Illustrious Lordship in reply to your letter of 9th December. And with all respect I state myself invariably
Of Your Most Illustrious Lordship
Florence 12 October 1771.
Most Devoted Obliged Servant
Domenico Aldini
Even in this case, it becomes necessary to send a copy of the letter again on October 22nd - which we then find together with the original.

7. Conclusion
From the examination of around fifty letters addressed between 1767 and 1781 to the customs minister of Cortona by Domenico Aldini, who manages the playing card warehouse in Florence, new information is obtained on the quantity of cards used in Cortona and its surroundings, and in particular on the maintenance of a ratio of approximately one to ten between minchiate and other cards (respectively approximately two and approximately twenty dozen per year). Furthermore, the functioning of the bureaucracy can be seen up close, with the more or less rigid compliance with detailed rules both for the replacement of defective cards and for the possible export of playing cards outside the Grand Duchy.

Florence, 25.10.2023

Florence 1814: Restoration, also for playing cards, pp. 1-2

27
Now I am posting a translation of another of Franco's essays, this one posted January 2, 2024, at https://naibi.net/A/FI1814.pdf). I undertook it before the rest of the 2023 pieces because it continues the narrative from the preceding essays already translated above, in particular from the reform of 1781, the latest date before now, and has similar terminology.

In the present essay, the year is 1814; a lot has happened in the interim. First there was the election to Holy Roman Emperor of the 1781 duke, Leopold I, in 1790, after which the new Grand Duke of Tuscany was his second son Ferdinand. Both were part of the new ruling dynasty of Habsburg-Lorraine (as Wikipedia's entry for "Grand Duchy of Tuscany" has it), so-called because Leopold's father, Francis Stephen, had been Duke of Lorraine previously, while his mother was the Empress Maria-Theresa. With Francis, Tuscany became part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, and although its Grand Duke, he ruled through viceroys, at least at first from Lorraine. When he died, Leopold moved to Florence with his new wife to establish the dynasty, where his son Ferdinand succeeded him.

Then came the French invasion of the 1790s, Ferdinand's exile, and the establishment of a French administration over all manner of civic life, including playing cards. That all came to a crashing end in 1814, of course, and Ferdinand returned to pick up the pieces. It is mainly a return to the old system, but with a few improvements "to prevent fraud, searches, and trials." In the internal correspondence from the time, we learn more about the process that system, which included considerable control over playing card production.

Franco's pdf in Italian makes extensive use of endnotes commenting on the transcripts, as well as two regular footnotes near the beginning. I have moved all the endnotes so that they appear at the bottom of the corresponding page (still following the pagination of the pdf, indicated in the left margin) for ease of reference, and also made both sets of notes one single series, with the former endnotes thus two numbers higher than Pratesi's numbers for them.

As usual, Franco's help has been essential, to decipher the archaic language, sentence structure, and abbreviations, regarding which Google Translate is quite clueless, as well as catching little errors of mine that would otherwise be there. No doubt there are others; please let me know.

For some reason the Forum software is not letting me post more than a couple of pages of Franco's pdf at a time. This post has his pp. 1-2. Pp. 3-4 are in the next post, and p. 5 is on the third. His page 6 is the endnotes, here at the bottom of the page they are notes to.

Florence 1814: Restoration, also for playing cards

Franco Pratesi

1. Introduction
Here the point of view is limited, because we are only witnessing changes within the offices responsible for controlling the production and use of playing cards in Tuscany; but the historical moment is of European importance: the fall of Napoleon and his empire, with the repercussions that reach down to the smallest administrations, as is precisely the one of interest to us.

We can reconstruct some aspects of the change mentioned on the basis of a bundle of documents preserved in the State Archives of Florence.(Note 1) In the Inventory of the collection in question (Note 2), there is only one item of interest to us: Playing cards and stamped paper: edicts and deliveries 1814. N. 18. The two administrations of playing cards and stamped paper were closely linked, and these documents also referred to both cases. In the following, I will leave out everything relating to stamped paper to concentrate on playing cards.

2. The plan for renewal of the procedures

Of particular interest is the plan concerning the new system to manage the administration of playing cards and stamped paper. It is a complete plan that continually refers to the procedures in use before those of the French government, largely contemplating a return to the prior ones, eliminating the changes recently introduced.

In reality, the changes introduced by the French administration mainly concerned stamped paper, to a lesser extent "normal" playing cards, while the system adopted for Minchiate had remained practically unchanged because it was a game, with its related cards, unknown to the new administration.

The documentation is made even more interesting by the fact that it presents the project, preceded by the relevant covering letter, in draft form, with additions and corrections. I transcribe them both below. In any case, I indicate in square brackets the parts added to the text later by a different hand; however, I do not report sentences or individual words deleted. (Translator's comments and indications of footnotes will be in parentheses.)
Excellency
Intent always to reactivate and make prosperous those Branches of Finance entrusted to me by the I. and R. (Imperial and Royal) Government with the view that the Royal Interest should not suffer any detriment by this part, [and with further consideration due to the public,] I have tirelessly dealt with the examination of the progress of the two Royal Stamped Paper and Playing Cards Enterprises, with the aim of proposing to Your Excellency that system which I believed to be the most advantageous [and the most adapted to the circumstances of the time].
First of all, I must let Your Excellency know that these two enterprises have always been united with each other and were equally so at the time of the auspicious Government of S.A.I. and R. (Sua Altezza Imperiale e Reale = His Imperial and Royal Highness) Ferdinand III Our August Sovereign. (Note 3)
Speaking first of all [about the reorganization] of the Royal Playing Card Enterprise, I am pleased to point out to Your Excellency that this Enterprise, in no way removed from [the essential principles of that] system which has been practiced since the time of the aforementioned Government, only needs to be reactivated with new regulations, in order to prevent the fraud which could occur and which is the cause of a large number of trials and searches, with disaster for the public.
To this end, I have formed the Plan for the setup of said Enterprise, as I put it together for Your Excellency, imploring your wise determination.
Combined with said Plan, Your Excellency will find the System [in detail] that was practiced at the time of the above-mentioned A.S.I and R. (same as S.A.I. and R. above) and that adopted by the past French Government.
In relation to the penalties for violators, I would believe that the Notification of 30 December 1780, as the one in force at the time of our beloved Sovereign, should be maintained.
It is necessary for me to point out to Your Excellency that there is in the warehouse a quantity of white watermarked paper in the number of sheets of approximately 130 thousand left by the past French Government, which was used for the manufacture
_____________________
1. ASFi, General Administration of Royal Revenues, 18.
2. https://archiviodistatofirenze.cultura. ... endite.pdf
3. Ferdinand III of Habsburg-Lorraine, Grand Duke of Tuscany from 1790 to 1801 and from 1814 to 1824.

2
of playing cards, as well as other watermarked paper of approximately 46 thousand sheets where the figures necessary to form said cards are (already) printed.

I would therefore be of the opinion that it would be profitable for the Royal Interest to use the aforementioned watermarked white paper to continue the manufacture of cards in their current size, because of this alone it is capable, and once this is completed, the Royal Enterprise will be able to use other paper manufactured on its behalf by a paper mill in the Grand Duchy to form Playing Cards of even larger dimensions; and I would believe it is even more appropriate to use said paper [which could be given greater body, or thickening, since the public is very dissatisfied with the thinness of the cards] to make use of that paper where the figures are already printed, because some of them represent Sacred Objects and venerable principles of good morals. (Note 4)
I commissioned Carlo Caolieri, the skilled and only wood engraver employed in the R. Gallery [and in the works] to engrave a printing block for the aforementioned figures similar to those [very decent ones as] customary at the time of the previously praised Government of R. and I.A.S. (same as A.I.S. and R.).
If my Plan is fortunate enough to meet with the approval of Your Excellency, it would be appropriate to issue a Notification to remove the Article relating to the permission of Cards without stamps outside the State, and to reinstate the penalties for violators under the terms of the aforementioned Law of 30 December 1780.
Now moving on to talk about the reorganization of the other Royal Enterprise, that of stamped paper, . . . In these two systems there is an enormous difference in the stamp duties; while at the time of R. and I.A.S. previously mentioned, such a duty was rather mild, at the time of the French Government, it was taken beyond the just and honest . . . .
For stamped paper, the writer therefore proposes to return to the old procedures and describes the operation in detail; he continues with the list of staff roles (19 ministers, assistants, and custodians already active and re-proposed for the two Enterprises), and concludes as follows.
[Should these very humble propositions of mine dictated by the zeal and attachment that I have always nurtured since my earliest years for the Royal Service be found worthy of your approval which I implore with this respectful representation, there would then be nothing left other than to refer it to this Imperial Secretariat the draft of the notification in compliance, to be published appropriately. In the meantime, I dare to propose the following formula for regulating the Role enunciated.] This present provisional Role of the Royal Revenues Stamped Paper and Playing Card Enterprises of Florence is approved, and the Counselor General Administrator of the Royal Revenues remains in charge of enforcement.
And with the deepest respect I pass to the honor of reputing myself
The 4th July 1814

Plan (note 5)
For the setup of the Royal Enterprise of Playing Cards [similar to the system practiced since the auspicious Government of S.A.I. and R. Ferdinand III with the addition only of what leads to ensuring the Royal Interest, and to preventing the contraventions that a longer experience has made known, which Project] can largely serve as instruction to the Ministers for the management of the same Enterprise.
This Enterprise will be reunited with the other of Stamped Paper, as it always was in the past, and the Ministers assigned to the mentioned Stamped Card Enterprise must equally serve for this of Playing Cards.
The cards that must be manufactured will be the following; like those that were customary in the past, and will pay as in the past [at the time of the auspicious Government of the aforementioned S.A.I. and R.
Minchiate cards, large Picchetti of 52 cards per deck and large Low Cards: one Paolo per deck. Said small ones and small Picchetti, one-half Paolo per deck. (note 6)
The manufacture of these cards must take place only in Florence, as has always been usual, and the General Administration of the Royal Revenues must grant the Patents to those subjects who will be deserving of them, as has been practiced in the past [i.e. since the time of the Government of the aforementioned Sovereign].
Said manufacturing must be carried out with the following method.
Each manufacturer will receive from the Warehouse of the Royal Enterprise [watermarked] paper which will be manufactured on behalf of the same by a paper mill, and this will be used to print the Suits of the decks to be formed [i.e. Diamonds, Clubs, Spades, and Hearts] together with the component Figures of the same, and he will pay the value that will be determined.
One can print the Suits (probably just the numeral cards) in his own factory. The Figures must be printed (note 7) in the Office in the presence of one of the Ministers, who will be designated by the Principal Minister.
To this end there will be only one printing block in the Office for the Figures for Picchetti and Low Cards, which will be used by all the manufacturers. (Note 8)
Each [of said manufacturers] will have to present themselves to print those quantities of Figures that they believe form said decks, but always on the paper designated by the Office, which they will request in the document. [The Minister responsible for this object will retain many small labels (Note 9) where the name and surname of each Manufacturer will be engraved, as will be printed on the Queen of Clubs when printing.]
______________________
4. They are obviously minchiate, and the respect for those images is curious, almost to be venerated like holy cards, sheets of paper similar in shape but with sacred images. In the following paragraph, he clarifies that he also proposed a more customary version.
5. The Plan is written on one sheet of paper divided into two columns, leaving the left one blank to accommodate numerous additions.
6. One paolo corresponded to 8 crazie. The lira (without entering into other units of account or coinage such as the various types of florins, or in more recent times the scudo) was divided into 20 soldi of 12 denari or piccioli [little ones]. Once we are able to easily read account books with this system, here is another one: in practice, the same lira was also divided into 12 crazie of 20 of the same denari. There were coins scattered between the two systems, usually with the copper quattrino of 4 denari at the base (so three quattrini made a soldo and five quattrini made a crazia). In the end, we thus find that 1 paolo corresponds to 13 soldi and 1 quattrino (L-S13d4), and half a paolo to 6 soldi and 2 quattrini (L-S6d8).
7. The method of "printing" the numeral cards is not precisely indicated, as they were probably not yet printed but only hand-painted, possibly with the help of perforated sheets.
8. This is important information, because in other times each card maker had their own woodblocks.
9. Rather than tags, they appear to be small plaques engraved in a personalized manner to be inserted in a special space in the single woodblock of all paper makers.

CONTINUED NEXT POST

Florence 1814: Restoration, also for playing cards, pp. 3-4

28
CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS POST, TRANSLATION OF https://naibi.net/A/FI1814.pdf, now with pp. 3-4.

3
Once said Figures have been printed, he [each manufacturer] can take them to his own factory to be colored according to the model (Note 10) that will be given to him by the Office, but before this, the number of printed Figures, and precisely the number of decks so formed, must be verified by the Minister in charge, by having the usual mark showing a lily affixed above the Queen of Diamonds.
Said Minister will then have the manufacturer produce a Receipt for the number of decks of cards, which he will have printed and will pass this on to the Accountant.
The Accountant will keep a Register in which he will open a Debit and Credit Account of each Manufacturer depending on the watermarked paper delivered, both to print the Suits and the Figures, in two different columns.
In Debit will be noted the watermarked paper for said Suits and the number of decks which will be printed as above. [The Manufacturer must use the paper marked with black dots externally, as was customary in the past, which was always used for minchiate cards under the happy Austrian Government.] (Note 11)
When said Manufacturer has decks such as Picchetti and Quadriglie formed in his factory, he will wrap these up as in former times, in plain white paper and present himself to the Accountant's Office, from whom he will receive an Entry Mandate to pay the Cash for the Stamp Duty on that quantity of decks which he wants to stamp.
[Said Accountant, in addition to recording the Entry for the Cash in the Copy of Orders, will immediately note in the above-mentioned Register of Manufacturers' Accounts and credit to the respective account the number of decks for which the stamp duty has been paid.]
Having paid such a fee, he [said Manufacturer] will present himself to the relevant Minister, show the Receipt for the payment, and upon this, the stamper will be ordered to affix the stamp to the quantity of decks for which he will have [as above] paid the fee.
This stamp will be affixed to the Jack of Hearts, as was practiced [as above at the time of S.A.I. and R.]
A single press will also be held in the Office to print the decks for Minchiate [, on which the extinct French Government, which did not know this Game at all, made no changes]. (Note 12)
Each manufacturer will go to the aforementioned Office, and on common paper at his pleasure, as has always been practiced by all the Governments, he will be able to print the decks, but in the presence of a Minister assigned to it.
The system mentioned above for the formation of decks of Picchetti and Quadriglie must also be extended [in terms of formalities] to that of Minchiate, with the exception of not making use of watermarked paper, but common paper, as has been said above.
The Mark showing the Lily must appear on the Libra (Bilancia) Card, and the stamp on the card showing No. 27, as was practiced in the past. [None of the manufacturers will be able to give the decks for resale, except to those persons who will be provided with the Resale License by the General Administration pro tempore of the Royal Revenues.]
They [Ministers] will have to carry out extraordinary Visits to the factories of each Patentee every time, as ordered by the same General Administrator of the Royal Revenues, in order to detect, with the results of the Register intended for the same, whether there are any frauds, i.e. if they have supplied unstamped decks [having found] a lack in the Figures already printed.
Such visits, however, must indispensably take place at the end [of each year], at which time the remainder of both the white watermarked paper and the paper on which both the Suits and the Figures will have been printed must be verified.
Such a balance must correspond to that which will result from the Debit and Credit Account of each manufacturer, entered in the Register as proposed above.
The manufacturers will be granted only a 10 percent allowance (on the amount) of this type of watermarked paper, which he (the manufacturer) will show as incapable of being used to make the decks (in order not to be accused of fraud, presumably). This paper will have to be withdrawn by the Enterprise, to be burned or torn up, but the manufacturer will not receive reimbursement of any amount on the value paid for it.
Once a lack of paper is found, where the figures forming said decks have been printed, the manufacturer will be obliged to pay the fee for all missing items, as he would have paid if he had presented himself to have the stamp affixed to them.
Such a failure will be considered as fraud, because it indicates a sale of decks without stamp duty, and therefore it will remain in the power of the General Administrative Officer of the Royal Revenues, in similar cases, to deprive the criminal manufacturer of the License [as was customary with happy success before the French].
There must be no agreement, as in the past, for the export of unstamped cards abroad, as the cause of an immensity of frauds to the detriment of the Royal Interest, and of a mass of trials and searches, with disaster for the public].

3. The handover of the superintendency of the offices

A brief correspondence between the offices, of which the one preserved is only a part, prepares and accompanies the transfer of responsibilities from one director to another.
____________________
10. Not only a single woodblock for all card makers, but also the freedom of how to paint the cards was evidently very limited.
11. Florence's relations with Lorraine were quite varied. The Lorraine from whose court Cristina, the wife of Ferdinand I of the Medici (with whom Galileo maintained an epistolary correspondence of a scientific nature) could not be considered Austrian; it so happens that this Grand Duchess had as her maternal grandmother the Queen of France, namely Catherine de Medici. However, when the new rulers of the grand duchy arrived from Lorraine, they were members of the Habsburg family, and Francis Stephen moved from the grand ducal court of Florence to the imperial court of Vienna. Since 1766, Lorraine has been a French region.
12.The tone is one of relief because, thanks to ignorance of the game, the French had not been able to introduce any of their obviously unwelcome changes. In the meantime, however, some changes to the card figures had been introduced.


4
1815 18th February
Stamped Paper and Playing Cards
Note from the Royal Secretariat of Finance, with which the General Administrator of the Royal Revenues participates in the reunion of those Enterprises at the Department of Contracts Revenue in the form of the Sovereign Law of said 11th February, that it is therefore necessary to accomplish the consignment of the Superintendency of the aforementioned office of Stamp Duty to the Director of the provisional Deputation of the Administration of Ecclesiastical Goods and United Enterprises.

Lord Counselor Administrator
Of the Royal Revenues
Excellency
The Sovereign Law of February 11th current on Stamped Paper and Playing Cards, having reunited these Administrations with that of Contract Revenues, or Registry, and having equally ordered that they cease all dependence on the General Administration of the Royal Revenues, the provisional Deputation for the Administration of Ecclesiastical Goods and United Enterprises, to which was also temporarily entrusted the management of the aforementioned Contracts Revenue, remains in charge of the provisions to be made for the activation of same Law, at the time prescribed therein of 15th March next.
Consequently, it is necessary for Your Excellency to immediately hand over the Superintendence of the aforementioned Office of Stamp Duty and Playing Cards to the Director of the aforementioned Deputation, so that those measures are not found to be stranded by the subordinate Ministers, which it is necessary to take with the utmost promptness, and which the regularity and best performance of the service require that they be given by those who must also subsequently supervise its execution.
I have the honor to indicate this to Your Excellency as a rule, to the effect that you can comply with the provisions of the Royal Government, while with perfect esteem I am honored to be
Of Your Excellency
Most Devoted Most Obliged Servant
A. Pontenani
From the I. and R. Secretariat of State
The 18th February 1815

His Excellency Lord Counselor Alessandro Pontenani
General Administrator of the Royal Revenues
Excellency
Consistent with the highly esteemed note of Your Excellency dated 20 current (month), I have instructed Secretary Alessandro Fabbroni to go to this Department, of which You deservedly preside, to receive the delivery of the two united enterprises of stamped paper and playing cards, having, by disposition of the Most Venerable Edict of the 11th current, both to be combined in the Office of Contracts Revenue.
Your Excellency will therefore please communicate to the aforementioned Minister everything that has to do with the two enterprises mentioned, convinced that you will give him everything to ensure that the Sovereign Orders are perfectly fulfilled. (Note 13)
And with the greatest respect I confirm myself
Of Your Excellency
Most Devoted Most Obedient Servant
Alessandro Galilei
From I. and R. Deputation of Ecclesiastical Goods etc.
The 21st February 1815

4. The transfer from Siena
One of the notifications introduced by the reform is the restoration of Florence as the sole production site for playing cards. Thus, Pasquale Falugi, who had recently managed to open a factory in Siena, was forced to move it to Florence, with control over the equipment used. From what little we find in the file, we would conclude that the official exchanges of news between Siena and Florence, and also between different offices in Siena, were not sufficiently timely and complete.
Royal Office of Stamp Duty and Playing Cards
Inventory of the woodblocks for Playing Cards of the Siena Factory of Pasquale Falugi placed in this Stamp Office by the Director of the Royal Customs of Siena on 1 February 1815 and existing at the consignment of the undersigned Minister of the Office of Stamp Duty and Playing Cards.
One woodblock of twelve Figures for Low Cards----------------------------------------------No. 1 (Note 14)
Eight woodblocks for cards of Rovescino as follows, i.e. (Note 15)
_____________________
12.The tone is one of relief because, thanks to ignorance of the game, the French had not been able to introduce any of their obviously unwelcome changes. In the meantime, however, some changes to the card figures had been introduced.
13. If the form remains obsequious, as usual, in substance it seems that he is abruptly responding to orders. Instead of going in person to receive the delivery, he sends the secretary. The way he requests assistance also seems like a higher-level official, in contrast to the tone of the previous correspondence.
14. The twelve figures are obviously three for each of the four suits; therefore a single woodblock is both necessary and enough. Only the way to "print" the numeral cards at the card factories remains a little uncertain.
15. The transition from one woodblock for Low Cards to eight for Rovescino cards is unexpected. Furthermore, these eight woodblocks would seem to be mostly used for the card backs, in different versions. We do not notice a woodblock for the figures different from that present for the Low Cards. Conversely, it can be assumed that at least one of these eight woodblocks was also used for the Low Cards, as an alternative to leaving the back blank. Indirectly, from here we have the news that the production of minchiate had not started in Siena.

TO BE CONCLUDED NEXT POST
Last edited by mikeh on 22 Jan 2024, 14:34, edited 1 time in total.

Florence 1814: Restoration, also for playing cards, p. 5

29
CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS TWO POSTS, TRANSLATION OF https://naibi.net/A/FI1814.pdf. Now p. 5; endnotes on his p. 6 appear as footnotes on bottom of appropriate page, here and in the other two posts)

5
1. One representing a medallion with a half-bust and inscription at the bottom Pelican----No. 1
2. As above, a Pelican feeding its children, with Sun and Moon in the corners----------------No. 1
3. As above Grand Ducal Arms, and inscription as above------------------------------------------No. 1
4. As above a Fox holding a Snake as above---------------------------------------------------------No. 1
5. As above a Medallion as above and more Trophies as above-----------------------------------No. 1
6. As above Arms Imperiale Austriaca and as above------------------------------------------------No. 1
7. As above, an armed Justice that Punishes Crime, and Pelican inscription-------------------No. 1
8. As above an Array of Points with Roses and outline of Festoons and Inscription as above-No. 1
Plus one hundred and ten glued cartoons containing prints of twelve Low Card figures without coloring, from an old model.
On the 9th March 1815
Undersigned Minister of the Stamp and Playing Cards Office, I declare that the aforementioned woodblocks and sheets, or glued cards, are delivered and that these are deposited in the Archives of this Stamp and Playing Cards Office of Florence.
G. Giusti

Siena Sig. Director
Of Contracts Revenues
The 13th March 1815
Most Illustrious
From Your Excellency's request day last, I note the reasons why you were unable to send me the General Account of the Income and Expenses from Stamp Duty and Playing Cards from January 1st to 24th March inclusive. In the meantime, I ask you to have these Auditors speed up the settlement of their accounts and to send me the result as soon as possible, so that I may be able to submit to the Royal Government the Final Demonstration of the products and expenses of that Enterprise for the time that was incorporated into the General Administration of the Royal Revenues.

Siena (Note 16)
Lord Francesco Chigi
Director of the Registry and United Enterprises
10 April
The woodblocks owned by card manufacturer Pasquale Falugi, of which Your Excellency speaks to me in your letter of day last were delivered to the Minister of the Stamp Office, Sig. Giuseppe Giusti, in accordance with his receipt of the 9th March past.
Finding from your aforementioned statement that this pending matter has not been completed either [two words not deciphered] with the aforementioned Minister in order to remove it.
And with the most distinguished respect I confirm myself

5. Conclusions
After a quarter of a century, Grand Duke Ferdinand III returns to govern Tuscany after the interval of French rule, understandably restoring many of the old administrative procedures. Control over playing cards is also involved in the changes; now that the grand ducal government returns, the offices are rushing to restore the old procedures, except to take into account the innovations introduced in the few cases in which they could prove useful for the Treasury.

Some of the relevant documentation, coming from the offices in charge, has been reported in detail. This is official correspondence, incomplete and sometimes present only in the preparatory draft version. However, these characteristics help us penetrate the offices and closely witness the events, intentions, and proposals on the measures to be taken. We thus obtain some information that we could not have known from the official laws and regulations which then represented the final result of these preparations.

These are documents of great interest, because they somehow photograph the confusion of the offices at the moment in which the French government had recently ended and that of the Habsburg-Lorraine Grand Duchy was being reorganized anew. The French came from the revolution and had actually revolutionized in every detail even the administrations of the subject states. The grand ducal offices had to adapt to the notable and sudden changes, and throughout the world and at all times this is something that is not appreciated by the bureaucracy.

Florence, 02.01.2024
_______________________
16. The letter from the previous day is missing.

END

Florence 1843-1845: Foreign cards and bureaucracy

30
Below is my translation, assisted by Google Translate and Franco, of the last - at least for now - of a series of reports on playing card regulations and state bureaucracy in the Grand Duchy in the period after 1750. The previous one reported various control measures to "reduce fraud, searches, and trials" while at the same time bringing in tax revenue from playing cards. However, at least one of them seems to have resulted in many more, at least of fines and trials, against travelers who wanted to bring a deck or two of cards into the Grand Duchy for personal use. Officials' conscientious efforts to correct the matter, moreover, seem to have produced a bureaucratic tangle.

That I post this report so soon after posting the previous one does not mean it was an easy job correcting Google Translate. I worked on both essays at the same time, since the vocabulary in the documents was so similar, and Franco accommodated me. I have combined Franco's one footnote and with his twelve endnotes and put them all at the bottom of the corresponding pages of his pdf (the numbers in the left margin). My translator's notes are in brackets. The original is at https://www.naibi.net/A/FI1843.pdf.

Florence 1843-1845. Foreign cards and bureaucracy

Franco Pratesi

1. Introduction
Years ago, I searched various collections of the State Archives of Florence, looking for documents on playing cards in Tuscany, and especially in Florence. For the Grand Ducal and post-unification periods, I then collected the main results in two books.[note 1] I recently identified other collections with useful documents. In this study, the material under examination is No. 89 of the collection Capirotti di Finanza – Finance Accounts. In particular, I studied two files concerning the control of foreign cards in the years 1843-1845.

The interest of these documents is that they deal with difficult-to-resolve questions on alternative interpretations of the relevant law, dating back to 1816. In combating the smuggling of playing cards, the law did not differ much from those which tended to prosecute the smuggling of salt and tobacco. First, the law prescribed a penalty of 25 lire for each deck of foreign cards discovered in the luggage of a traveler within the grand duchy. This provoked considerable protests from foreigners in transit who owned their own deck of cards and used it as a pastime. Therefore, the need was emerging on the part of customs officers to distinguish cases by number of decks, and above all between new and used cards, in order to be able to adapt the punishment for smaller cases.

The problem, as usual, is that reasonable solutions to the problems of interpretation of the law require the approval of several higher bodies, up to and including the opinion and pronouncement of the Grand Duke himself. So we are witnessing an exchange of correspondence between different offices, among which it is not even easy for us to understand the hierarchical relationships, largely clouded in the written testimony by the formulas of deference that abound both up and down.

I considered it useful to transcribe the documentation preserved in this regard in the first file, precisely to provide an overview of the environment from an internal point of view.

But the matter does not end here, because there is a second file that completes the observation of the environment. Also in this case, there is an exchange of correspondence between the various directors of the offices interested in the same problem of control over foreign playing cards. However, in this case the approach is practically the opposite. In the first case, the Florentine central offices had to examine a proposal from an office in Livorno to lighten the sentences. In this second case, the proposal, again put into practice in Livorno, tended instead to aggravate the same penalties.

There was in fact a substantial difference between the penalties on playing cards and those on salt and tobacco. In other cases, the offender who did not have the necessary amount of money to deposit as security (or who, despite having the money, did not intend to deposit it) was arrested and brought to trial. This procedure was not foreseen for playing cards, and in this case it was possible for the offender not to pay, and only be deprived of the playing cards, to the detriment of the treasury. Then, in a manner deemed arbitrary by other offices, the director of the Livorno office gave instructions to the customs guards and the other employees involved to deal with cards as with salt and tobacco.

We thus witness the request for opinions from multiple offices, with the typical response that the proposal could also be accepted if, and only if, validated by a specific amendment to the law being approved by the Grand Duke. For this second case, I do not transcribe all the correspondence preserved because that of the first case is already sufficient to convey the idea of the formal system of the search for a convergence of opinions; that is, I limit myself to the selection of a few letters.
_________________
1. Card games in the Florentine republic. Ariccia 2016; Playing-Card Production in Florence. Tricase 2018.

2
2. Proposal for lesser penalties

The topic has already been indicated in the Introduction. I transcribe the correspondence directly below, inserting some comments at the end.
Commendatore Administrator General of the Royal [RR = plural] Revenues
Give your opinion The 23rd [note 2] Sept. 1843. Pelli Fabbroni [note 3]

To His Excellency Signore Cavaliere Gran Croce
Francesco Cempini
Current Intimate Advisor on State, Finance, and War
Director of the Royal Finances and the Royal General Depository
Excellency
The systematic Law for the Playing Card Enterprise issued on the 25th August 1816 subjects any Violator to a fine of Twenty-five Lire for each deck, as prescribed by the same Law in relation to the prohibition on introducing Foreign Cards into Tuscany even for simple transit.
Experience has justified that while it is important for the prosperity of the same Enterprise that the provisions of the specified Law are kept in strict observance whenever it involves a real transgression, which is aimed at causing fraud and prejudice to the Royal [R = singular] Finance, there are however cases in which the excessively rigorous application of the same Law could take on the appearance of harassment, especially in the face of foreigners who keep only one or two decks of Playing Cards, and those they introduce to use for their pastime and entertainment and to deceive, as people say, the boredom of travel. More especially, it occurs when people of some distinction, free from the suspicion of wanting to dedicate themselves to the petty trafficking of said playing cards, keep one or two decks already used without having been warned when entering Tuscany that they [note 4] cannot make any use of them. Therefore, to obviate any idea of harassment in this regard, and to moderate the penalty of the fine where there can be no doubt of malicious intent on the part of the Violator, I have taken the liberty of compiling the following detailed instructions, which I submit to the superior wisdom of Your Excellency, so that if you deem it appropriate, you may deign to invoke the eminent Sovereign approval, or be pleased to descend to me in this connection those orders which may appear most appropriate to you for this purpose. [note 5]
And with deep respect I come to confirm myself
Of Your Excellency
Most Devoted Most Obliged Servant Tommasi [note 6]
From the General Office of the Registry and United Enterprises
The 22nd September 1843.

Signore Cavaliere Commendatore
Administrator General of the Royal Revenues
Illustrious Signore Pro. [?] Most Respected Signore
I have gone through the attached Draft Instructions concerning the execution of the Law of the 25th August 1816 on foreign playing cards, which I received with the precious letter of your Excellency from day last.
In my opinion, honest Passengers can only appreciate the questioning by Employees of the Health and Customs Office as to whether or not they keep foreign playing cards and to be informed by them that their use, retention, and free transport are prohibited in Tuscany.
It is well understood that the benefit of transit is preserved with the precautions established by the Orders for those who want to take advantage of it and that the denunciation for those who have refused only subjects them to the abandonment which I would believe could convert into demotion.
It also seems to me to be wise advice to promise a different treatment to passengers who, when questioned, do not report their playing cards to Customs, and who are found by the Guards to retain one or two used decks (probably to divert the boredom of the journey), from those who would have more abundance, and much more if the decks were new.
Having left it to your superior determinations, I have the honor of signing myself with the greatest respect
Of Your Most Illustrious Lordship
Most Devoted Most Obliged Servant
Giuseppe Casanuova Director
Livorno, from the Directorate of Customs
The 25 September 1843

Instructions
concerning the execution of the Law of 25 August 1816 on Playing Cards.
Article 1. The Ministers of Health at the Office of the Mouth for the Port of Livorno, and the Customs Agents and Ministers at each State Border, upon the arrival of any Vessel, and respectively of any
________________
2. The period after the numbers was usually inserted at the time and I respect it in the transcription. [Trans. note: for the translation, the periods have been replaced with “th,” “st,” “nd,” or “rd.”]
3. This is a note added, on the fly, on the upper margin of the letter, without particular attention to spelling. The office is perhaps the Finance Secretariat, but the higher hierarchical level is evident.
4. In various subsequent comments and proposals it will be asked that travelers always be warned about this law, directly upon first entry into the Grand Duchy.
5. The proposer does not intend to commit an abuse: either his proposal is approved from above and made legally valid, or he is given instructions in this regard. In the second case, it is understood that a response of respecting the old law to the letter would be inconvenient.
6. I moved this line here. However, in all these official letters, the final formula with the signature is inserted in the lower right margin of the page, detached from the rest.


3
Vehicle, Coach, and Carriage that serves for the transport of Passengers or Goods, will question the Owners or Captains of the Vessel, and in the case of Vehicles, the Drivers or Owners thereof, whether or not they, as well as the travelers, Crewmen, or Foreign Passengers, have Playing Cards, warning them of their introduction into Tuscany being prohibited even for simple transit. If the answer is affirmative, they will be asked either to carry out the exact declaration in Art. VIII of the aforementioned Law of the 25 August 1816, if they wish to pass the aforementioned Playing Cards through the Tuscan Territory, or to deliver and release the same Playing Cards which, as above, are found among them.
2nd. In case they choose to make the aforementioned declaration, in consequence the Games or Decks of Cards will be directed, with the precautions and systems indicated by the Law, to that Border Customs by which they will have to exit from the Territory of the State.[note 7]
3rd. If the Foreign Playing Cards are then delivered and released, after having been wrapped and after said bundle has been well sealed and provided with the Stamp of the Office, the aforementioned Cards will be returned, if in Livorno to the Extraordinary Stamp Office existing there, if elsewhere, to the nearest Registry Office, accompanied in any case with a relevant report that makes known their origin and anything else that affects their delivery and release. The aforementioned offices to which the parcels mentioned have been sent, together with the related reports, will have to send both to the General Directorate of the Registry and Joint Enterprises in Florence through the respective Departmental Registry Directorates on which the offices themselves immediately depend.
4th. Verifying that despite the diligence to be carried out as above at the Office of the Mouth of the Port of Livorno and at the Customs Offices of the Borders, there were found by the Royal Guards of Finance or by Customs Agents and Ministers at the City Gates or elsewhere within the State, Decks or Games of Foreign Cards, provided that it involves no more than one or two Decks or Games of said Cards, and especially if they are used ones, so that there is reason to believe that they are transported by the Carriers or Passengers solely to make use of them during the journey rather than with the idea of becoming an object of smuggling and trafficking, in this case subject to the arrest and confiscation of said Cards which with a similar report will be submitted to the Head of the nearby Customs Office, and from this to the General Directorate of the Registry and United Enterprises, it will be up to the Director General of the Administration of the Registry and United Enterprises to propose, according to the character and nature of the circumstances that have accompanied the Transgressions, regarding the fines incurred for the same Transgressions to His Excellency the Counselor Director of the Imperial and Royal Secretariat of Finance, or the plenary condonation of the same fines, or those reductions which according to the circumstances of the cases appear appropriate, always considering that for the aforementioned cases [note 8] the Customs Agents or Ministers are very discreetly mollified, and also considering that to ensure the payment of what may be due for these securities by the aforementioned Violators, they must deposit at the Customs Office to which the Agents and Ministers are assigned, or the Royal Finance Guards who carried out the procurement in question, Ten Lire if there is only one Deck or Game, and Twenty Lire if two are the Games or Decks of Foreign Cards that have been found. [note 9] According to what has been approved by His Excellency the Counselor Director of the Imperial and Royal Secretariat of Finance in relation to the proposed condonations, or the aforementioned reductions, the relevant pending matters will remain settled and adjusted long before said transgressions have been brought to the knowledge of the competent Courts, as well as after the relevant Judgment has been entered on the same; and by said Courts, once the approval of the aforementioned Excellency has occurred, and the conditions prescribed by the defendant have been fulfilled, the case will not be further proceeded with, thus giving rise to the restitution of the Ten or Twenty Lire as deposited above, deducting what is necessary to satisfy the conditions on which the aforementioned Superior Resolution is based; and without prejudice to the provisions of the Supervisory Laws regarding the allocation of how much with the Resolution itself was ordered to be collected as a Fine.
5th. When the Foreign Games or Decks of Cards found at the City Gates or elsewhere within the State are such in quantity and quality as to lead one to believe that those in the same State were intended to be trafficked in fraud of the now valid Law, and generally whenever said Games or Decks of Foreign Cards are found within the State in quantities greater than two Decks or Games, especially if they are Games that do not appear obviously used, in this case it will be the responsibility of the Royal Finance Guards and Customs Agents and Ministers to proceed in this regard with all rigor against Violators, in the usual ways and by the Supervisory Laws prescribed.

Signore Cavaliere Commendatore
Giovanni Baldasseroni
Administrator General of the Royal Revenues
Most Illustrious Signore Pro. [?] Most Respected Signore
The aim that motivated the General Directorate of the Registry certainly deserves applause in having formed the Draft Instructions forwarded to me by your Most Illustrious Lordship with your Revered Letter of the 26th of this month and which, together with the other papers, I have the honor of returning to You.
Reading that Draft would have called me to make the following observations.
To Art. 1. The task that you want to give to the Ministers of the Livorno Health Office alone. Could it not perhaps be extended with advantage to those of the other Offices on the coast?
_____________________________
7. A single deck of cards, brought back to today, would suggest a nuclear warhead.
8. Agents risk making mistakes, however they behave, if they are not reassured from above.
9. A new and more useful progression is introduced. However, the jump from 20 lire for two decks to 75 for three remains high, but in other cases the possession of three decks is already considered an indication of fraud.


4
I would believe that the Owners of the Playing Cards could not be denied the right to release them on board the Ship, or to send them back in the foreign State. [note 10]
Art. 2. If the playing cards are wished to be destined for transit, the Ministers of the Border Customs through which they would be introduced must not accompany them with a Manifesto to another similar one from which it is preferred to export them, but rather to a Principal Customs, in which alone the Expediting Pass can be created.
Art. 3. It would seem just as simple, equally as regular, that the documents delivered to the Border Customs Employees be sent by them to the respective Directorates on which they depend and from these to the General Directorate of the Registry.
Art. 4 and 5. The Ministers of Customs attend the inspections but do not inspect or make complaints. Therefore the name of Customs Ministers should be eliminated from the proposed Articles.
Art. 4. I would doubt that the Resolution of His Excellency the Counselor Director of the Royal Finances to withhold the procedure once the complaint was filed was valid, unless a similar Sovereign Disposition was published, or with Special Motu Proprio [Latin for “own initiative”], as was practiced in the year 1768. when the Administrators General of the Royal Revenues were created, or in similarity to what was ordered by the Royal Council with the Circular of 8 April 1839.
Your Most Illustrious Lordship will give to these observations the weight of which in his wisdom he deems them worthy.
I have the honor to declare myself with the most distinguished respect
Of Your Illustrious Lordship
Most Devoted Most Obliged Servant
G. O. Forni
From the Customs Directorate of Florence
The 28 September 1843

His Excellency Signore Cavaliere Gran Croce
Counselor of State & &
Director of the Imperial and Royal Department of Finance
Excellency
I have the honor of returning to Your Excellency the Draft Instructions concerning the execution of the Law on Playing Cards, dated the 25th August 1816, drawn up by Sig. Cav. Director General of the Administrative Office of the Registry, regarding which I have been ordered to express what my feelings may be.
The aforementioned Law, by prohibiting the introduction of Foreign Cards into Tuscany, even for simple transit, imposed a fine of L. 25 for each deck on the Violator.
This precise and exhaustive provision excludes in its application any exemption: [note 11] at once, even the introduction of a single deck is, by express will of the law, subject to a fine. I do not deny that the prescription is rather severe, as indeed are all the laws that protect royal property rights, [note 12] but I only highlight it to deduce that in the state and terms resulting from the Law of 1816, arrests, from even a single Deck of Cards, were sometimes carried out by Customs Agents, a regular and not vexatious activity.
The Draft Instructions compiled by Sig. Cav. Tommasi essentially modifies that rigor, nor would I be able to make any objection to it, as it deals with something extraneous to this Administrative Office, but which only concerns the one which is deservedly presided over by the aforecommended Director.
No less for the relationships that in their practical execution the same Instructions could have with the Customs Service, I took it upon myself to have them examined by the Signori Directors of the Customs of Florence and Livorno.
The latter has fully agreed upon them, while Cav. Forni, also agreeing with them in principle, has suggested in the Letter attached, here in the Copy, some few interesting warnings regarding the ways and forms of the [Instructional] Draft imagined. These warnings seeming to me to have made all the wise and appropriate connections, I would be of the reverent opinion that the few additions that result from them be inserted into the Draft in question, which I also would consider in need of Sovereign Rectification, so that in its practical application it does not encounter difficulties in the Courts.
I have the honor of recalling with respectful consideration
Of Your Excellency
Most Humble Most Devoted Servant
G. Baldasseroni
From the General Department of the Royal Revenues
The 2nd October 1843
3. Proposal for greater penalties
The file under review contains a dozen letters, often copies, under the common title of Transgressions of the Playing Cards Law. 7 December 1844 - 29 May 1845. This is a selection in which we can follow, with some exceptions, the chronological order, but where we find neither the initial nor the final documents in the case in question. I therefore allow myself to make a further selection
_____________________
10. This suggestion seems logical, but is only encountered here.
11. Outside the office, epicheia would be called exemption.
12. This appears to be the most solid argument. The severity is directly justifiable: long and expensive life for the Grand Duke.

5
of the letters by copying some of them here, in a sufficient number to make the exchange of correspondence between the various offices involved clear. The functioning of the administration presents an unexpected contrast between very rapid exchanges of official correspondence, right from one day to the next, alongside delays of months.
Signore Cavaliere Royal Prosecutor-General
Florence
Most Illustrious Signore Po. [?] Most Respected Signore
The Law of the 25 August 1816 on Playing Cards does not order the deposit against unknown offenders, and in the absence of which their arrest, as it is prescribed with regard to offenders of Salt and Tobacco. Now I am informed that the Director General of the Registry has circulated an instructional letter of 8 August, 1843, which contains the following paragraph.
“That whenever it is impossible to obtain from the aforementioned Violators (of Playing Cards) the aforementioned deposit, either due to the alleged lack of means, or because they do not want to lend themselves to carrying it out, in this case the Royal Guard of Finance will be ordered to translate said Violators before the competent local Authority, which will be responsible for issuing the appropriate orders and measures to be adopted in order to guarantee as much as possible the interest of the Royal Finance, and of those who are justified in relation to the fines incurred."
This order aggravates the condition of the Violators beyond what is prescribed by the Law and compromises the responsibility of the Royal Guards of Finance, who by carrying it out would be exposed either to having to answer for abuse of power, or to compromising the dignity of the Law and of the Authority by alleging their own exemption from their Superior's command.
It is therefore of the utmost interest that this inconvenience and danger be remedied.
And to this effect, I believed it was my duty to engage your authority so that the order is either revoked or converted into law.
And with the most distinct respect I have the honor of recalling myself
Of Your Most Illustrious Lordship
Most Devoted Most Obliged Servant
Signature
Livorno, from the Office of the Prosecutor
The 7th October 1844

Imperial and Royal Highness
As Your Imperial and Royal Highness may deign to observe from the attached official communication from the Cavaliere Royal Prosecutor General, the Cavaliere Director General of the Registry has circulated to his Employees an instructional letter, which, with a view to guaranteeing the Royal Finance, and depending on the transgressions of the Laws on Playing Cards, would lead to the liability of Violators who are not indeed unknown, as the Royal Prosecutor of Livorno has perhaps not exactly expressed, but rather of unknown solvency, for those rigorous and serious precautions that Art. 46 of the Law of 2 Sept. 1819 on transgressions in matters of salt prescribes, and which are not commanded by the Law of the 25th August 1816 on Playing Cards.
With this the same Cavaliere Director General of the Registry having certainly transcended the limits of his mission, in order to avoid the possible inconveniences feared by the same Royal Prosecutor of Livorno, we would implore that the previously praised public Functionary be invited to withdraw the Instructional Letter of which he is the author.
With profound veneration we have the glory of being
Of Your Imperial and Royal Highness
Most humble Servants and Subjects
Giovanni Battista Burchi
Vincenzio Giacomini
Cosimo Buonarruoti
Primo Magini
From the Royal Council
The 23rd December 1844
With this opinion of the members of the Royal Council, it would seem that the bureaucratic process had come to an end. Instead, the practice restarted the year, because evidently the right solution to the problem had not been found.
Report of the Brigade Chief of the Royal Finance Guards
For the Most Illustrious
Sig. Cav. Director of the Royal Customs of Livorno
Most Illustrious Signore

6
The Law on Playing Cards does not authorize the arrest of the foreign Violator, and much less the collection of the deposit for the amount of the penalty incurred, as has been pointed out on another occasion. It follows that since it is not possible to prosecute said Foreign Violators who have not wanted to leave the aforementioned deposit, the Procedures remain fruitless, and the related Expenses are borne by the Tax Fund. So the undersigned would propose to avoid said Procedures in this case, and to deliver the apprehended cards to the Registry Office, especially when it concerns a Transgression of one or two decks of them, and when it does not please to provide for the aforementioned void in said Law.
This is all
Livorno, the 27th May 1845
Betti

Signore Cavaliere Commendatore
Administrator General
of the Royal Revenues
Florence
Most Illustrious Signore
On 10 December last year following a first report from the Brigade Chief Signore Botti, I had to point out to Your Most Illustrious Lordship the need to fill the gap in the Law of the 25 August 1816 on foreign cards not prescribing the 'Arrest of the holder of the same, when he is without the means to pay, or guarantee the fine incurred, or even refuses to pay it, even if he wanted to ensure the fulfillment of the requirements of the General Directorate of the Registry articulated in the Revered [Communication] of Your Most Illustrious Lordship of the 9 August 1843.
Now with a 2nd specific Report attached here, the same aforementioned Brigade Chief returns to demonstrate that either it is better to fill the void in the Law, or to abstain from initiating useless Procedures, the results of which can only be borne by the Tax Fund, if one is limited to delivery of the apprehended cards to the Registry Office.
And while waiting for the Superior Determinations, I pass to the honor of recalling myself with the most distinct respect
Of Your Most Illustrious Lordship
Most Devoted Most Obliged Servant
Giuseppe Casanuova
Livorno Customs Directorate
The 27th May 1845.

Signore Cavaliere Director
of the Administration of the Registry and United Enterprises
Florence
Most Illustrious Signore Pro. [?] Most Respected Signore
The attached documents, sent to me by the Customs Directorate of Livorno, tend to highlight the need to fill the void found in the Law of the 25th August 1816 on foreign playing cards, since it does not prescribe the arrest of their Holder in the event that he is without the means to guarantee satisfaction of the penalties that may be owed by him,
I take them to the revered hands of Your Excellency, but since the knowledge of the relevant Affair is within the competence of the Department over which you deservedly preside, only permitting me to ask you to favor me to provide me with any response that can appear appropriate to you [note 13] according to my rule, in the Instructions to be given to the Financial Force for the contingencies spoken of in the documents themselves.
I have the honor to sign myself with the most distinguished esteem and respect.
Of your Most Illustrious Lordship
G. Baldasseroni
From the General Department of the Royal Revenues, the 28 May 1845

His Excellency Signore Gran Croce
Francesco Cempini
Counselor of State, Finance, and War
Director of the Imperial and Royal Secretariat
of Finance, and of the Royal General Depository
Excellency
With my respectful participation on the 12th December 1844, I took the liberty of pointing out to Your Excellency the need to bring about a Sovereign Resolution regarding the arrest of transgressors of the current Law on Playing Cards, which by the Chancellor of the Court of Livorno and by that Royal Prosecutor was considered to be arbitrary, when the same violators did not want or were unable to deposit the relevant fines imposed by the aforementioned law.
_________________________
13. The sequence of six verbs in the sentence is a record for polite formulas.


7
And since the Commendatore Administrator General of the Royal Revenues forwards me the attached documents with which the Royal Finance Guard and the Director of the Royal Customs of Livorno are once again making every effort to take the appropriate measures in this regard, I cannot help but urgently pray to Your Excellency to deign to solicit, as far as it can depend on you, that Sovereign Resolution which will be considered the most suitable to repress the transgressions of this type and to protect the interests of the Royal Finance.

In the meantime, it would appear to my tenuity useful and appropriate that the aforementioned Commendatore Administrator General of the Royal Revenues be exhorted to send down the appropriate orders to the Royal Finance Guard so that they refrain from proceeding with any arrest or coercive action against the holders of Playing Cards of foreign manufacture until the aforementioned Sovereign Resolution is issued, limiting themselves only to the relevant reports, even when it is not possible to persuade the Violators to deposit the Fines they have incurred. Since it is in the expectation of those Orders that it could please the Imperial and Royal Government in this regard to issue on this report I have made it lawful to exhort the aforementioned Signore Commendatore Administrator General to communicate to the Royal Finance Guard that they wish to abstain from carrying out the abovementioned arrests to avoid any related inconvenience.
And with the highest consideration and respect, I have the honor to confirm myself
Of Your Excellency
Most Devoted Most Obedient Servant
Tommasi
From the General Registry Office and United Enterprises
The 29th May 1845
After two years of exchanges of correspondence between the offices concerned, the necessary provisions have still not arrived. For now, an official change to the law is missing, and even the exhortation from the higher offices not to follow up on the Instructions to the Livorno customs employees is missing.

4. Conclusion
On the control of foreign cards within the Grand Duchy of Tuscany, two bureaucratic problems to be resolved have been encountered, which appear not only different but with opposite deviations from the norm: in one case the penalties are lightened, in the other they are aggravated. Both cases encounter similar bureaucratic delays, even if forms of courtesy and respect, if not downright veneration, are used to the highest degree in correspondence between offices. Sooner or later a solution will have been found, but it seems clear that the Tuscan bureaucracy had not reached a level of agile functioning in those years, despite the Leopoldian reforms first and those introduced by the French afterwards.

Florence, 02.01.2024